BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )Tuesday v. STATE
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
With the above observations, this petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438
- TNEB Act, 2003 s. 134(a)(B)
Judgment
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )Tuesday, the Twentieth day of December Two Thousand ElevenPRESENTThe Hon`ble Mr. Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAHCRL OP(MD) No.16665 of 2011R.R.C. PITCHUMANI... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.2 VsSTATE, THROUGHTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PASUVANTHANAI POLICE STATION, PASUVANTHANAI, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT CR NO. 56/2005... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANTFor Petitioner : M/S. G.R.EDMUND AdvocateFor Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Addl. Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-The petitioner/Accused No.2 prays for grant of anticipatory bailunder Section 438 Cr.P.C., for the alleged offence punishable underSection 134(a)(B) of TNEB Act, 2003 in C.C. No.18 of 2009, on the file ofthe learned District Judge, Thoothukudi.2. Heard both sides.3. During arguments, it transpired that non-bailable warrant ispending against the petitioner herein.4. Hence, in such a case, I do not incline to grant anticipatorybail. However, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the TrialCourt within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this orderand to seek for recalling of Non-Bailable Warrant and the Court concernedis directed to consider the said petition filed by the petitioner forrecalling the warrant and pass orders on the same day on merits.5. With the above observations, this petition is disposed of. sd/- 20/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)TO1. THE DISTRICT JUDGE,THOOTHUKUDI.2. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICEPASUVANTHANAI POLICE STATION, PASUVANTHANAI, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.3. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTORMADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.+1. CC to M/S. G.R.EDMUND Advocate SR.No.44558 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16665 of 2011 Date :20/12/2011RJ/22.12.11/(1p/5c)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With the above observations, this petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438; TNEB Act, 2003 — s. 134(a)(B).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.