Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ANITA SUMANTH, ANDC KUMARAPPAN
Outcome
Withdrawn
Manokaran, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner makes an endorsement to the effect that this writ petition is not pursued, recording which, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned District Collector by way of an appeal under Section 10 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 2/4
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Chennai III Act, 1905 s. 6
- Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act s. 10
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. The Revenue Inspector, Sivakiri Firka, Sivagiri Taluk, Thenkasi District.... Respondents1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.26230 of 2025PRAYER:- Writ Petition - filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for records pertaining to the impugned notice along with the…
Judgment
W.P.(MD)No.26230 of 2025BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED: 22.09.2025CORAM: THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH ANDTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPANW.P.(MD)No.26230 of 2025andW.M,P.(MD)No.20428 of 2025K.Ravikumar... Petitioner/Vs./1. The District Collector, Collectorate Campus, Thenkasi, Thenkasi District.
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Sangarankovil, Thenkasi District.
The Tahsildar, Sivakiri Taluk Office, Sivagiri, Thenkasi District.
Operative part
The Revenue Inspector, Sivakiri Firka, Sivagiri Taluk, Thenkasi District.... Respondents1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.26230 of 2025PRAYER:- Writ Petition - filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for records pertaining to the impugned notice along with the order vide in SVGREV/563/2025-B2 dated 01.08.2025 passed by the 3rd respondent under Section 6 of the Chennai III Act 1905 quash the same and consequently forbearing the respondents or its men or agents from with confiscated to remove petitioner's concrete house kitchen build and steps from lawful possession of the property. For Petitioner : Mr.P.ManokaranFor Respondents: Mr.S.P.Maharajan Special Government PleaderORDER (Order of the Court was made by DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.)Mr.P.Manokaran, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner makes an endorsement to the effect that this writ petition is not pursued, recording which, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned District Collector by way of an appeal under Section 10 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.26230 of 20251905. The petitioner is also given liberty to move a stay application, if so inclined. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is dismissed.[A.S.M.J.,] & [C.K.J.,] 22.09.2025 NCC:Yes/NoIndex :Yes/NoInternet: YessmNote: Registry is directed to return the original impugned order to the petitioner forthwith, after obtaining photostat copy of the same. To1. The District Collector, Collectorate Campus, Thenkasi, Thenkasi District.2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Sangarankovil, Thenkasi District.3. The Tahsildar, Sivakiri Taluk Office, Sivagiri, Thenkasi District.4. The Revenue Inspector, Sivakiri Firka, Sivagiri Taluk, Thenkasi District.3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.26230 of 2025DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.ANDC.KUMARAPPAN, J.smOrder made inW.P.(MD)No.26230 of 2025 Dated:22.09.20254/4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Manokaran, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner makes an endorsement to the effect that this writ petition is not pursued, recording which, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned District Collector by way of an appeal under Section 10 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 2/4
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Chennai III Act, 1905 — s. 6; Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act — s. 10.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.