Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- V PERIYA KARUPPIAHCR
Outcome
Disposed of
With the abovesaid direction, this Petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 482
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 420, 467, 468, 471, 471(A)
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Considering the submissions made by both sides, this Court is inclined to record the submissions of the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) and to direct the third respondent to investigate the case in Crime No. 67 of 2011 as expeditiously as possible and to file…
Judgment
1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED: 14.11.2011CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAHCrl.O.P.(MD).No.14724 of 2011 Thilagavathy ... Petitioner Vs.
The Superintendent of PoliceMadurai RuralMadurai District2.The Deputy Superintendent of PoliceUsilampattiMadurai District3.The Inspector of PoliceChekkanurani Police StationMadurai Districtin Crime No. 67 of 2011 ... RespondentsPRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the third respondent, Inspector of Police, Chekkanurani Police Station, to file a final report in Crime No.67 of 2011. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Safar Badhusha For Respondents : Mr.P.Kannithevan Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side)
O R D E RThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the third respondent, Inspector of Police, Chekkanurani Police Station, to file afinal report in Crime No. 67 of 2011.
Heard Mr.K.Safar Badhusha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.P.Kannithevan, learned Government Advocate (CriminalSide) appearing for the State.
The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the petitioner has filed a Petition under Section 482 ofCr.P.C., before this Court and the same was ordered on 03.01.2011,directing the respondents to register an FIR. As per the order of this Court, the respondent has filed an FIR against the accused persons on06.02.2011, in Crime No. 67 of 2011 with the third respondent for the alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 471(A) of IPC. Hewould further submit that after filing of an FIR, the accused persons moved an anticipatory bail before the District Sessions Court, Maduraiand the same was ordered, but it was not complied by the accused. Hewould also submit that the petitioner has given a representation in person to the first respondent on 08.05.2011 regarding the inaction of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2the third respondent, but no action has been taken. Therefore, he would request the Court that a direction may be issued to the third respondent police to complete the investigation and to file a final report in CrimeNo. 67 of 2011 on the file of the third respondent.
The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would submit in his argument that on the complaint given by the petitioner, a case has been registered in Crime No. 67 of 2011 and the investigation will be expeditiously done and the final report will be filed within a period of six months before the appropriate Court.
Operative part
Considering the submissions made by both sides, this Court is inclined to record the submissions of the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) and to direct the third respondent to investigate the case in Crime No. 67 of 2011 as expeditiously as possible and to file a final report, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.6. With the abovesaid direction, this Petition is disposed of. Sd/-Assistant Registrar (Records)/True Copy/Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)To1.The Superintendent of PoliceMadurai Rural, Madurai District2.The Deputy Superintendent of PoliceUsilampatti, Madurai District3.The Inspector of PoliceChekkanurani Police Station, Madurai District4.The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, Madurai+1cc to Mr.K.Safar Badhusha, Advocate, SR.No.39670vsgGH : 29.11.2011 : 2p/6cCrl.O.P.(MD).No.14724 of 201114.11.2011
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With the abovesaid direction, this Petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 420, 467, 468, 471, 471(A).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.