Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-In view of the endorsement made by the learned counselappearing for the petitioners, this criminal original petitionis dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT(Criminal Jurisdiction)Saturday, the Twelfth day of November Two Thousand ElevenPRESENTThe Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHUCRL OP(MD) No.14714 of 20111 N.ANBUMANI2 N.SARAVANAN3 N.JEEVANATHAM :PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 1 TO 3-Vs-THE STATE REP. BYTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KANNIVADI POLICE STATION,KANNIVADI, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.CR.NO.141 OF 2011
:RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANTFor Petitioner : M/S. K.R. LAXMAN, AdvocateFor Respondent : Government Advocate, (Crl.side)PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER :
The Court Made the following order :-In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, this criminal original petitionis dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- 12/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO:
THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KANNIVADI POLICE STATION, KANNIVADI, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.RP/16.11.2011/1p/3c. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14714/11 Date :12/11/2011.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-In view of the endorsement made by the learned counselappearing for the petitioners, this criminal original petitionis dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.