✦ Madras High Court

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )Friday v. THE STATE

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released onbail, in the event of arrest or on his appearance before thelearned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam, on executing a bond fora sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten Thousand only) with two suretieseach for a like sum to the…

Judgment

Cause title

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )Friday, the Fourteenth day of October Two Thousand ElevenPRESENTThe Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHUCRL OP(MD) No.13820 of 2011RAMACHANDRAN : PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 Vs.THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUMANGALAM TOWN POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.CRIME NO.571 OF 2011

: RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTFor Petitioner : M/S. R.VENKATESWARAN AdvocateFor Respondent :

Mr. K.S.DURAIPANDI Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

ORDER :

The Court Made the following order :-Apprehending arrest, the petitioner, in Crime No.571 of 2011 onthe file of the respondent Police for the alleged offences punishableunder Sections 171(E), 171(H) of IPC, and 133 of the Representativeof Peoples Act and 66 and 192(A) of the Motor Vehicles Act read with188 of IPC, has come forward with this Petition seeking foranticipatory bail.

2.

According to the case of the prosecution, the petitioner wasfound in possession of Rs.7,800/- for the purpose of distributing thesame to the voter in the ensuing local body election.

3.

The said allegation is denied by the petitioner. According tohim, he never intended to distribute any amount to any voter.

4.

Having regard to the above allegations and all otherattending circumstances, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail tothe petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5.

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released onbail, in the event of arrest or on his appearance before thelearned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam, on executing a bond fora sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten Thousand only) with two suretieseach for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police orthe police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction ofthe learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that thepetitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and whenrequired. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulatedunder Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. sd/- 10/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,THIRUMANGALAM.2. -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,MADURAI DISTRICT.3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICETHIRUMANGALAM TOWN POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.+1 CC to M/S. R.VENKATESWARAN Advocate SR.No.35686 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13820 of 2011 Date :14/10/2011NSV/18.10.11/2P/6C

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments