P.MUTHURAJ v. STATE REP. BYTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION,TRICHENDUR, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In view of the same, this petition is dismissed as unnecessary
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 s. 498(A)
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In view of the same, this petition is dismissed as unnecessary. sd/- 18/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO1. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICEALL WOMEN POLICE STATION,TIRUCHENDUR, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.2. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTORMADURAI BENCH…
Judgment
Cause title
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )Tuesday, the Eighteenth day of October Two Thousand ElevenPRESENTThe Hon`ble Mr. Justice S.NAGAMUTHUCRL OP(MD) No.13810 of 2011P.MUTHURAJ... PETITIONER
/ ACCUSED NO.1 VsSTATE REP. BYTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION,TRICHENDUR, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.... RESPONDENT
/ COMPLAINANTCRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2011 For Petitioner : M/S. R.JAYAPRAKASH AdvocateFor Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Addl. Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER :
The Court Made the following order :-Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for offences under Sections 498(A) IPC, the petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking anticipatory bail.
It is submitted by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor that neither a case has been registered nor a petition is pending against the petitioner.
Operative part
In view of the same, this petition is dismissed as unnecessary. sd/- 18/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO1. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICEALL WOMEN POLICE STATION,TIRUCHENDUR, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.2. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTORMADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.+1. CC to M/S. R.JAYAPRAKASH Advocate SR. No.36022 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13810 of 2011 Date :18/10/2011RJ/19.10.111p/4c
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the same, this petition is dismissed as unnecessary
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 498(A).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.