PRABU v. STATE
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail refused
The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within aperiod of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failingwhich, anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 2525. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in theevent of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned JudicialMagistrate No.VI, Madurai, and on his executing a bond for a sum ofRs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for…
Judgment
Cause title
1BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )Wednesday, the Fourteenth day of September Two Thousand ElevenPRESENTThe Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALACRL OP(MD) No.12159 of 2011PRABU ... PETITIONER
/ACCUSED NO.7 VsSTATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE AVANIYAPURAM POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICTIN CR.NO. 339 OF 2011
RESPONDENT
/COMPLAINANTFor Petitioner : M/S. R.VENKATESWARAN AdvocateFor Respondent : MR. A.RAMAR, Additional Public Prosecutor. PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER :
The Court Made the following order :-The petitioner/Accused NO.7 apprehends arrest at the hands of therespondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147,148, 294(), 323, 406 and 506(ii) IPC and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu WomenHarassment Act, in Crime No.339 of 2011 on the file of the respondentpolice and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.
The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that thepetitioner has already been enlarged on anticipatory bail in Crl.OP(MD)No.10949 of 2011 on 23.08.2011, but he was unable to produce the suretieson the stipulated time, hence the petitioner filed the present petitionseeks for anticipatory bail.
The learned Additional Public Prosecutor fairly conceded that thepetitioner has already got anticipatory bail.
Considering the rival submissions made on both sides, ti sis seenthat since the petitioner has already been enlarged on anticipatory bail hewas unable to produce the sureties within the stipulated time and hence, Iam inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certainconditions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Operative part
Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in theevent of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned JudicialMagistrate No.VI, Madurai, and on his executing a bond for a sum ofRs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned and onfurther condition that the petitioner shall report before the Courtconcerned daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders. The petitioner shallcomply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. 6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within aperiod of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failingwhich, anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed. sd/- 14/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.VI, MADURAI2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI3 THE INSEPCTOR OF POLICE, AVANIYAPURAM POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTORMADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12159 of 2011 Date :14/09/2011TR : 19.09.2011: 2p/5c
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within aperiod of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failingwhich, anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438; Indian Penal Code, 1860; Tamil Nadu WomenHarassment Act — s. 4.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.