Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- R MALACRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITIO
Provisions considered
Judgment
1BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED: 09.08.2011CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALACriminal Original Petition(MD) No.10296 of 2011A.Muthulakshmi.. PetitionerVs.
The Superintendent of Police, O/o. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District.
The Inspector of Police, Land Grabbing Special Wing, Tirunelveli District... RespondentsPrayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.praying to direct the respondent to register the case on thepetitioner's complaint dated 11.07.2011 and proceed with the same asper law within the time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner :Mr.S.RajasekarFor Respondents :Mr.K.V.Rajarajan, Govt. Advocate(Crl. Side)ORDERThe petitioner approaches this Court with a prayer to direct the respondent to register the case on the petitioner's complaint dated11.07.2011 and proceed with the same as per law within the time frame fixed by this Court.2. Heard both sides.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has given a complaint on 11.07.2011 to the respondents. But, so far, no action has been taken on his complaint.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner fairly conceded that the petitioner has not followed the dictum laid down in the case in Sakiri Vasu vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others reported in 2008 (2) SCC 409. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Since, the petitioner has not followed the dictum laid down in the case in Sakiri Vasu vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others reported in 2008 (2) SCC 409, the petitioner is directed to avail the alternative remedy as per the dictum laid down in Sakiri Vasu vs. State of UttarPradesh and Others reported in 2008 (2) SCC 409, before filing this application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.6. With the above observation, this Criminal Original Petition isdisposed of. Sd/-Assistant Registrar(Records)/TRUE COPY/Sub Assistant RegistrarTo1. The Superintendent of Police, O/o. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District.2. The Inspector of Police, Land Grabbing Special Wing, Tirunelveli District. 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1cc to Mr.S.Rajasekar, Advocate SR.No.27059Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10296 of 201109.08.2011ArulPA/22.08.2011/2P/5C
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.