Lourthu Sasikala Thersa v. The Inspector of Police
Case at a glance
- Bench
- R MALA
Provisions considered
Judgment
1BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED : 04.08.2011CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALACrl.O.P.(MD).No.10028 of 2011 Lourthu Sasikala Thersa... Petitioner-Vs-The Inspector of Police, Taluk Police Station, Thanjavur.... RespondentPRAYER: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner. For Petitioner :Mr.A.ArunprasadFor Respondent: Mr.K.V.Rajarajan, Govt Advocate (Crl. side)
O R D E RThis petition has been filed to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner.
The main grievance of the petitioner is that without any valid reason, the respondent is harassing the petitioner for which the learnedGovernment Advocate (Criminal Side) would gainsay such allegations.
Whatever might be the circumstances, there shall be no harassment to the petitioner, but let the police investigate into the matter in accordance with law and the mandates as found set out in D.K.Basu Vs. Stateof West Bengal reported in AIR (1997) SC 610. If really, the police want to interrogate, it is open for the police to issue summons to the petitioner. Thereupon, the petitioner shall appear before the police and submit himself for interrogation. The petitioner is also permitted to take the assistance of the Advocate to the limited extent as found envisaged in the precedent cited supra.
With the above direction, this petition is closed.SD ASST REGISTRAR ( CO )/TRUE COPY/SUB ASST REGISTRAR gsrTO1.The Inspector of Police, Taluk Police Station, Thanjavur. 2. The Addl. Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.DM::2011:AUGUST:25:: Crl.O.P.(MD).No.10028 of 201104.08.20111P:3C:
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.