Anjammal v. Review
Case at a glance
- Bench
- R VIJAYAKUMAR
Outcome
Disposed of
In view of the above said affidavit filed by the review applicant/ writ petitioner, this Review Application stands disposed of, granting time till 28
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. U.Gomathi ... Respondents/ RespondentsPRAYER: Review Petition is filed under Order 47 Rule 1 and 2 r/w Section 114 of C.P.C., praying this Court to review the order dated 13.07.2022 passed by this Court in W.P(MD) No.12606 of 2012 and allow the present Review Application.…
Judgment
Rev. Aplw(MD) No.134 of 2023 of 2025BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED : 03.12.2025 CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMARRev. Aplw(MD)No.134 of 2023inW.P(MD) No.12606 of 2012 Anjammal ... Review Applicant/ Petitioner- Vs-1. The District Collector, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District.
The Tahsildar, Orathanadu Taluk, Orathanadu, Thanjavur District.
U.Gomathi ... Respondents/ RespondentsPRAYER: Review Petition is filed under Order 47 Rule 1 and 2 r/w Section 114 of C.P.C., praying this Court to review the order dated 13.07.2022 passed by this Court in W.P(MD) No.12606 of 2012 and allow the present Review Application. For Petitioner: Mr.V.Elangovan1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Rev. Aplw(MD) No.134 of 2023 of 2025 For R1 and R2: Mr.M.Gangadharan Government AdvocateFor R3: Mr.N.BalasubramanianORDERThe present Review Application has been filed seeking to review the order dated 13.07.2022 made in W.P(MD) No.12606 of 2012, wherein this Court has directed the writ petitioner to deposit the maintenance amount on or before 15.10.2022. The said order was passed based upon the undertaking given by the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner.2. The review application has been filed with a contention that the counsel was not authorised to give such an undertaking.
Operative part
The Review applicant has filed an affidavit. Paragraph No.10 of the affidavit is extracted as follows:
10. I state that I am a destitute widow, raising three female children and one male child, the Property against which the said Impugned Auction Proceedings is my dwelling house and small agriculture land, wherein I and my Children 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Rev. Aplw(MD) No.134 of 2023 of 2025currently live. Hence citing my current circumstance, it would be of great relief to me, if I am permitted to pay the requisite amount as per this undertaking, with some more grace time. To that effect I am filing this Undertaking affidavit, wherein I undertake that the amount of Rs.1,30,500/- to remit before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Orathanadu in C.M.P.No.1706 of 2007 within a period as would be stipulated and ordered by this Hon'ble Court in this Rev.APLW (MD) No.134 of 2023
.3. In view of the above said affidavit filed by the review applicant/ writ petitioner, this Review Application stands disposed of, granting time till 28.02.2026 for remitting a sum of Rs.1,30,500/- (Rupees One Lakh Thirty Thousand and Five Hundred only) before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Orathanadu in C.M.P.No.1706 of 2007.
Till such deposit is made, the revenue recovery proceedings shall be kept in abeyance. On payment of the said amount the revenue proceedings shall stand set aside.3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Rev. Aplw(MD) No.134 of 2023 of 20254. With the above said observation, this Review Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 03.12.2025Index: Yes/NoInternet: Yes/NoNCC: Yes/NoebsiTo1. The District Collector, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District.2. The Tahsildar, Orathanadu Taluk, Orathanadu, Thanjavur District.3. The Judicial Magistrate, Orathanadu.4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Rev. Aplw(MD) No.134 of 2023 of 2025R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J.ebsi Rev. Apl.W(MD)No.134 of 202303.12.2025 5/5
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above said affidavit filed by the review applicant/ writ petitioner, this Review Application stands disposed of, granting time till 28
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 114.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.