S.Sivanandam v. The Managing Director,TNSTC, Kumbakonam Division,Kumbakonam.2.The General Manager,TNSTC Kumbakonam Ltd.,Pudukkottai Region,Pudukkottai.3.The Assistant Manager,TNSTC
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. The Branch Manager, TNSTC Kumbakonam Ltd.,Pudukkottai Region Mofussil Branch, Pudukkottai. ... Respondents1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP.(MD)No.23507 of 2024 Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining…
Judgment
WP.(MD)No.23507 of 2024BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED : 29.01.2026CORAM : THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHIWP.(MD)No.23507 of 2024andWMP.(MD)Nos.19893 & 19894 of 2024S.Sivanandam ... PetitionerVs.
The Managing Director, TNSTC, Kumbakonam Division, Kumbakonam.
The General Manager, TNSTC Kumbakonam Ltd.,Pudukkottai Region, Pudukkottai.
The Assistant Manager, TNSTC Kumbakonam Ltd.,Pudukkottai Region, Pudukkottai.
Operative part
The Branch Manager, TNSTC Kumbakonam Ltd.,Pudukkottai Region Mofussil Branch, Pudukkottai. ... Respondents1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP.(MD)No.23507 of 2024 Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned charge memo TNSTC/PUD/DS-3664/ABSO19/D1-223/2023 dated 13.04.2024 issued by the second respondent and consequential show cause notice issued by the second respondent signed by the third respondent in his proceedings in TNSTC/PUD/DS-3664/ABSO19/D2-223/2023 dated 19.09.2024 and quash the same as illegal consequently direct the respondents 1 to 4 to give alternative work to the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.R.VijayalakshmiFor Respondents : Mr.K.Jegadeesh Balan, Standing Counsel ORDERThe learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP.(MD)No.23507 of 20242.Recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.29.01.2026NCC : Yes/NoIndex : Yes/NoInternet: Yesgns3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP.(MD)No.23507 of 2024B.PUGALENDHI,JgnsWP.(MD)No.23507 of 2024 29.01.20264/4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.