Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
With the above observations, this Writ Petition is allowed
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Registration Act, 1908 ss. 77(A), 83
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. The Sub Registrar, O/o.Kariapatti Sub Registrar, Kariapatti, Kariapatti Taluk, Virudhunagar District.... Respondents1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.22878 of 2024PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 4 to 6 to…
Judgment
W.P(MD)No.22878 of 2024BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED : 08.08.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHYW.P(MD)No.22878 of 2024 Regina Begum ... Petitionervs.
The Govt. of Tamilnadu, Rep its by the Secretary, Dept of Commercial Taxes and Registration, St.George Fort, Chennai-600 009.
The Inspector General of Registration, 100, Santhome High Road, Chennai-600 028.
The D.I.G. Of Registration, Ramanathapuram Zone, Integrated Complex of Registration, Vandikaran St, Ramanathapuram -623 501.
The District Collector, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District.
The District Registrar (Admin) O/o.Virudhunagar District Registrar, Virudhunagar.
The Sub Registrar, O/o.Kariapatti Sub Registrar, Kariapatti, Kariapatti Taluk, Virudhunagar District.... Respondents1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.22878 of 2024PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 4 to 6 to delist the property from the Registered property of the petitioner survey no. 1/2 measuring 2 Acres and 15 cents at Melakallankulam Village, Kariapatti Taluk, Virudhunagar District, Tamilnadu and consider representation dated 15.07.2024 and pass orders within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner: Mr. N.Murugesan For R1: Mr.D.Sasikumar Additional Government Pleader ORDERThe present Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 4 to 6 to delist the property from the Registered property of the petitioner survey no.
Operative part
1/2 measuring 2 Acres and 15 cents at Melakallankulam Village, Kariapatti Taluk, Virudhunagar District, Tamilnadu and consider representation dated 15.07.2024 and pass such other or further orders as this Court.2. This Court without expressing any opinion on merits is directing the official respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 15.07.2024 and pass orders in accordance to law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If the application is submitted 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.22878 of 2024under Section 77(A) of the Registration Act, the official respondents are directed to conduct an enquiry under Section 83 of the Registration Act, after issuing notice to all the parties and thereafter, pass orders in accordance to law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.3. With the above observations, this Writ Petition is allowed.
There shall be no order as to costs. 08.08.2025NCC: Yes / NoIndex: Yes / NoInternet: YesKsa3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.22878 of 2024To1. The Govt. of Tamilnadu, Rep its by the Secretary, Dept of Commercial Taxes and Registration, St.George Fort, Chennai-600 009.2.The Inspector General of Registration, 100, Santhome High Road, Chennai-600 028.3.The D.I.G. Of Registration, Ramanathapuram Zone, Integrated Complex of Registration, Vandikaran St, Ramanathapuram -623 501.4.The District Collector, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District. 5. The District Registrar (Admin) O/o.Virudhunagar District Registrar, Virudhunagar. 6. The Sub Registrar, O/o.Kariapatti Sub Registrar, Kariapatti, Kariapatti Taluk, Virudhunagar District. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.22878 of 2024S.SRIMATHY , J. KsaORDER MADE INW.P(MD)No.22878 of 2024DATED : 08.08.20255/5
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With the above observations, this Writ Petition is allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Registration Act, 1908 — ss. 77(A), 83.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.