C.Jothi v. R.Jeyaraj2.J.Pavunthai
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
In view of the above, this Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In view of the above, this Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs. 24.03.2026NCC :Yes/NoIndex :Yes/NoInternet : Yes/ Nocsm2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.(MD)No.909 of 2014To1. The Subordinate Judge, Uthamapalayam.2. The District Munsif, Uthamapalayam.3. The Record Keeper, Vernacular Section, Madurai…
Judgment
S.A.(MD)No.909 of 2014BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED: 24.03.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKARS.A.(MD)No.909 of 2014andM.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015C.Jothi... Appellant/ Appellant/ PlaintiffVs.
R.Jeyaraj2.J.Pavunthai... Respondents/ Respondents/ Defendants PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the judgment and decree dated 04.09.2013 made in A.S.No.16 of 2012, confirming the judgment and decree dated 11.04.2012 passed in O.S.No.32 of 2011 on the file of District Munsif, Uthamapalayam. For Appellant : Mr.K.KevinkaranFor Respondents : Mr.V.Muthu Kamatchi for R1 No appearance for R21/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.(MD)No.909 of 2014JUDGMENTThe Second Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.16 of 2012 dated 04.09.2013 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Uthamapalayam, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.32 of 2011 dated 11.04.2012 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Uthamapalayam.
When the matter is taken up today, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant would submit that since the dispute was settled out of the Court, the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the second appeal and they have also circulated a letter to the Registry dated 18.03.2026 to that effect and also made an endorsement.
Operative part
In view of the above, this Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs. 24.03.2026NCC :Yes/NoIndex :Yes/NoInternet : Yes/ Nocsm2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.(MD)No.909 of 2014To1. The Subordinate Judge, Uthamapalayam.2. The District Munsif, Uthamapalayam.3. The Record Keeper, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.(MD)No.909 of 2014K.MURALI SHANKAR, Jcsm Judgment made inS.A.(MD)No.909 of 2014andM.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015 Dated : 24.03.20264/4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above, this Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 100.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.