Sureshkumar v. S.Karunamoorthy
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
In view of the said submission now made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, without adverting to the merits or the contentions, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioner 2/4
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 r. 5; s. 151
Judgment
CRP(MD). No.2280 of 2023BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 03/07/2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANICRP (MD). No.2280 of 2023and CMP(MD) No.11733 of 2023Sureshkumar ... PetitionerVsS.Karunamoorthy ... RespondentPRAYER :- Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 20.02.2023 in IA No.3/2023 in OS No.95/2020 on the file of the II Additional District Judge, Tiruchirappalli. For Petitioner: Mr.S.Rajesh KannaFor Respondent: No appearanceORDERThis Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the order dated 20.02.2023 in IA No.3/2023 in OS No.95/2020 on the file of the II Additional District Judge, Tiruchirappalli.1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP(MD). No.2280 of 20232. The petitioner is the defendant in OS No.95/2020 and the respondent/plaintiff filed the said suit for recovery of a sum of Rs.60,63,332/- in which the respondent/plaintiff filed an application under Order .. Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure for attachment before judgment and an order of attachment was passed. Challenging the same, the petitioner is before this Court. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that respondent/plaintiff filed the said suit for recovery of money. After trial, he filed an application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure to reopen the case for adducing further evidence and the same was allowed. Challenging the same, the petitioner is before this Court. However, the learned counsel would submit that the chief-examination of the plaintiff is over and the petitioner may be permitted to cross-examine the witnesses. 4. In view of the said submission now made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, without adverting to the merits or the contentions, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioner 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP(MD). No.2280 of 2023to cross-examine the witnesses. No costs. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 03.07.2025NCC : Yes/NoIndex : Yes/No RR TO1.The II Additional District Judge, Tiruchirappalli.2.VR Section Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP(MD). No.2280 of 2023 M.DHANDAPANI,J RR ORDER IN CRP(MD) (NPD) No.2280 of 2023 Date : 03/07/20254/4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the said submission now made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, without adverting to the merits or the contentions, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioner 2/4
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — r. 5; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.