N.Palraj v. The State of Tamil Nadu
Case at a glance
- Bench
- S SRIMATHY
Outcome
Allowed
Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that at the time of granting anticipatory bail, vide order dated 09.02.2023 in Crl.OP(MD)2084/2023, this Court directed the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- and the petitioner has deposited the same. Since the C.C.No.768 of 2023…
Judgment
Cause title
CRL MP(MD). No.8534 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )Date : 22/09/2025PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHYCRL MP(MD). No.8534 of 2025N.Palraj ... Petitioner
VsThe State of Tamil Nadu, Rep By,The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Dindigul District. (Crime No.34 of 2022) ... Respondent
/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.R.Shankar Ganesh For Respondent : Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam AzadGovernment Advocate (Criminal side)PRAYER :- Petition filed under Sec.528 of BNSS Act, 2023/482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the Learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul to refund the amount of a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- (Rupees One Lakh and Fifty Thousand), which was deposited by the Petitioner to the credit of Crime No.34 of 2022 based on the direction of this Court in Crl.O.P (MD).No.1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL MP(MD). No.8534 of 20252084 of 2023, in the light of the order passed in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.1294 of 2024 dated 29.04.2025 on the file of this Court quashing the Charge Sheet in C.C.No.768 of 2023 on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul.
ORDER :
The Court made the following order :- Earlier the petitioner along with other accused persons had filed a petition to quash the C.C.No.768 of 2023 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul before this Court. Vide order dated 29.04.2025, this Court has quashed the above C.C.No.768 of 2023 and allowed the petition filed by the petitioner.
Operative part
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that at the time of granting anticipatory bail, vide order dated 09.02.2023 in Crl.OP(MD)2084/2023, this Court directed the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- and the petitioner has deposited the same. Since the C.C.No.768 of 2023 is quashed, the petitioner is entitled to get refund of the deposited money. Hence, the said amount shall be refunded to the petitioner within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL MP(MD). No.8534 of 2025of this order. 3. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed. 22.09.2025PJLTo1. The learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul.2. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Dindigul District.
The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL MP(MD). No.8534 of 2025S.SRIMATHY,J. PJL CRL MP(MD) No.8534 of 2025 Date : 22.09.20254/4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 528; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.