Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. This Court, without going into the merits of the case, directing the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation after issuing notice to the petitioner as well as the other legal heirs and siblings of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders, within a period…
Judgment
W.P.(MD)No.15970 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.06.2026CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHYW.P.(MD)No.15970 of 2026M.Ganesan ...PetitionerVs.
The District Collector District Collector Office, Viruthunagar District.
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional, Vembakottai, Viruthunagar District.
The Tahsildar The Tahsildar Office, Vembakottai, Viruthunagar District. ...RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent issue patta to the petitioner 's father based on the petitioner's representation dated 15.04.2026 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.15970 of 2026within stipulated time. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Subramanian For Respondents : Mr.S.Siva Thilakar Counsel for the State of Tamil Nadu (For R1 to R3)
O R D E RThis petition has been filed seeking to directing the 3rd respondent issue patta to the petitioner 's father based on the petitioner's representation dated 15.04.2026 within stipulated time.2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner claims rights over the property based on the registered Document No. 43 of 1953. It is further stated that the petitioner’s father died on 13.02.1992 and the petitioner’s mother died on 04.07.1990, leaving behind six legal heirs, namely four females and two males. The petitioner is now seeking issuance of patta in the name of the petitioner’s father. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.15970 of 20263. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the State/respondents 1 to 3.
Operative part
This Court, without going into the merits of the case, directing the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation after issuing notice to the petitioner as well as the other legal heirs and siblings of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.12.06.2026Index :Yes / No Internet: YesNCC: Yes / No msrm3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.15970 of 2026To1. The District Collector District Collector Office, Viruthunagar District.2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional, Vembakottai, Viruthunagar District.3. The Tahsildar The Tahsildar Office, Vembakottai, Viruthunagar District. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.15970 of 2026S.SRIMATHY, JmsrmOrder made inW.P.(MD)No.15970 of 202612.06.20265/5
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.