Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed
Provisions considered
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 s. 528
- Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 ss. 5(1), 6, 11(5), 12
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 s. 342
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 s. 127
Judgment
Crl.O.P.(MD).No.10947 of 2026BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED : 12.06.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMARCrl.O.P(MD)No.10947 of 2026Saravanan... Petitioner/ Sole Accused Vs1. The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Marthandam, Kanyakumari District. (Crime No.6 of 2019) ... 1st Respondent/ Complainant2.xxxxxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx Kanyakumari District... 2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant3. Manimegalai... 3rd Respondent/ Mother of the VictimPRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, to call for the records in Spl.S.C.No.81 of 2019 before the learned Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District and to quash the same as against the petitioner and pass such further or other orders as this Court may deem fit.1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD).No.10947 of 2026For Petitioner : Mr.V.Balaji RajaramFor R1 : Mr.B.Arum Government Advocate (Crl. Side)For R2 & R3 : Mr.S.Arul ORDERThe present Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the sole accused in Spl.S.C.No.81 of 2019 on the file of the learned Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District, seeking to quash the charge sheet wherein the petitioner is charged with the offence under Sections 342 of IPC (under Section 127 of B.N.S) and Section 5(1), 6, 11(5), 12 of the POCSO Act, 2012.2. The date of birth of the victim girl is 11.02.2007. The occurrence is said to have taken place on 11.03.2019.3. It is reflected in the charge sheet that the sole accused and the defacto complainant were in love with each other. However, the sexual assault had taken place without her consent. In the Section 164 statement also, the defacto complainant has stated that without her consent the sexual relationship has taken place.2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD).No.10947 of 20263. The victim girl had attained majority on 11.02.2025 and thereafter, she had got married to another person. It is also brought to the notice of this Court that the sole accused is also now married to a different lady. In such circumstances, both of them have entered into a joint compromise seeking to quash the present charge sheet.4. The victim/defacto complainant is present before this Court along with the child and she submits that she is married to a third party and therefore she does not want to prosecute the present case. She further submits that she had voluntarily agreed for quashing of the charge sheet.5. This Court is of the considered opinion that the sole accused as well as the defacto complainant have entered into relationship, who are originally in love with each other, had fallen apart due to difference in caste and they have chosen to marry two different persons. Now they want to lead their own life and they do not want to continue with the present prosecution.6. Considering the marital life of both the parties, especially the victim girl who had chosen to marry a third party and she has begotten a child, this 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD).No.10947 of 2026Court is of the considered opinion that continuation of the cirminal proceedings would be a harassment to both the parties. 7. In view of the above said facts, the charge sheet in Spl.S.C.No.81 of 2019 on the file of the learned Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District, is hereby quashed.8. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. The joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of the order. 12.06.2026NCC: Yes/NoIndex :Yes / NoInternet:Yes / Noebsi4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD).No.10947 of 2026To1. The Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District2. The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Marthandam, Kanyakumari District.3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD).No.10947 of 2026R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J.ebsiCrl.O.P(MD)No.10947 of 202612.06.20266/6
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 528; Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — ss. 5(1), 6, 11(5), 12; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 342; Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 127.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.