Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
Accordingly, this petition is allowed and the substantive sentence ofimprisonment alone is suspended pending disposal of the appeal and thepetitioner/appellant is directed to be enlarged on bail on condition that onpetitioner/appellant executing a bond for a sum of Rs
Provisions considered
Judgment
CRL MP(MD) No. 8175 of 2025BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03-07-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE R.N.MANJULACRL MP(MD) No. 8175 of 2025in Crl.A(MD).No.703 of 2025 KaruppasamyPetitioner(s) VsState Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, AWPS-Thilagar ThidalMadurai, (In Crime No. 8 of 2023) Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.BhaskarFor Respondent(s): Mr.A.Alberty JamesGovernment Advocate (crl.side)ORDERThis Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to suspend the sentence of imprisonment imposed on the petitioner/appellant by the learned Principal SpecialCourt for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Madurai, in Spl.C.C.No.92 of2023, dated 20.05.2025.1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL MP(MD) No. 8175 of 20252. The case of the prosecution is that on 24.02.2023 at about 05.00 pm., the accused, who lived in the same block where the victim girl lived, knowing well that the parents of the victim were not at home, knocked the door.
When the victim opened the door, he tresspassed into the house, grabbed her braid and pushed heron the bed. When the younger sister of the victim screamed, the accused fled away from the scene of occurrence. 3. After conclusion of trial, the learned trial Judge found the accused guilty and convicted him for the offence under Section 451 of IPC and Sections 7 and 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act 2012 and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/-(Rupees Two Thousand only), in default to undergo simple imprisonment for afurther period of 4 months for the offence under Section 451 of IPC; to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees FiveThousnad only), in default to undergo simple imprisonment for a further period of six months for the offences under Sections 7 and 8 of POCSO Act.4.
The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that even though the accused and the victim girl are said to be residing in the same residential block comprising several houses, the prosecution failed to examine any independent witness or neighbours to substantiate the alleged incident. Even though the2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL MP(MD) No. 8175 of 2025allegation has been made that the accused had pushed the victim on cot, the cot is not shown in the rough sketch or the place of the occurrence. Without any clarity, charge sheet has been filed against the appellant and the trial Court has also not properly appreciated the evidence. 4. In view of the above said grounds, the appeal has been admitted and the notice was served upon the defacto complainant to hear any objection to release the accused on bail by suspending the sentence imposed on him. The defactocomplainant appeared in-person and has stated that he had no objection to suspend the sentence against the petitioner.5.
Operative part
The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that order of suspending the sentence can be granted on condition.8. Considering the fact that there are arguable points involved in this criminal appeal and further the criminal appeal is not likely to be taken up for final hearing in the near future, this Court is of the considered view that the petitionerherein/appellant is entitled to the relief of grant of suspension of sentence.9. Accordingly, this petition is allowed and the substantive sentence of imprisonment alone is suspended pending disposal of the appeal and thepetitioner/appellant is directed to be enlarged on bail on condition that onpetitioner/appellant executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL MP(MD) No. 8175 of 2025 Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of PrincipalSpecial Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Madurai and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the Trial Court once in amonth on the 1st working day of every English Calender month at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. sd/- 03/07/2025 / TRUE COPY / 03/07/2025 Sub-Assistant Registrar ( C.S. I / II / III / IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
RmkTo1 THE PRINCIPAL SPECIAL JUDGEFOR EXCLUSIVE TRIAL OF CASES UNDER POCSO ACT,MADURAI.2.The Inspector Of Police, Awps-Thilagar ThidalMadurai,3 The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1. C.C. to Mr.P.BHASKAR Advocate SR.No.7117 Dated :03/07/2025 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL MP(MD) No. 8175 of 2025 ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No. 8175 of 2025in Crl.A(MD).No.703 of 2025 Date :03/07/2025MK/03.07.2025 5P/5C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023 5/5
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this petition is allowed and the substantive sentence ofimprisonment alone is suspended pending disposal of the appeal and thepetitioner/appellant is directed to be enlarged on bail on condition that onpetitioner/appellant executing a bond for a sum of Rs
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — ss. 7, 8; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 451; Sexual Offence Act, 2012.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.