Kalyanasundaram v. State rep byThe Inspector of Police
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Recording the above said submissions, this criminal revision case stands dismissed as abated. 20.08.2025NCC: Yes/NoIndex: Yes/NoInternet: Yes/NosbnTo1. Additional District Court, Srivilliputtur2.The Judicial Magistrate, Rajapalayam.
Judgment
Crl.R.C.(MD).No.635 of 2019BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDated : 21.08.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNANCrl.RC(MD)No.635 of 2019 Kalyanasundaram ... Petitioner/Appellant/ Sole AccusedVs. State rep by The Inspector of Police, Seithur Rural Police Station, Virudhunagar District, Crime No.124 of 2006 ... Respondent/Respondent/ComplainantPRAYER: Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records and set aside the conviction and sentence imposed by the Additional District Court, Srivilliputtur in Crl.A.No.174 of 2012 on 29.01.2019 in confirming the conviction and sentence imposed by the Judicial Magistrate, Rajapalayam in C.C.No.492 of 2006 on 09.11.2012. For Petitioner: Mr.M.Jothi BasuFor Respondent: Mr.A.Albert James Government Advocate (Crl. Side)1/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.(MD).No.635 of 2019ORDERWhen the matter is taken up for hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner reported to be dead.
Recording the above said submissions, this criminal revision case stands dismissed as abated. 20.08.2025NCC: Yes/NoIndex: Yes/NoInternet: Yes/NosbnTo1. Additional District Court, Srivilliputtur2.The Judicial Magistrate, Rajapalayam.
The Inspector of Police, Seithur Rural Police Station, Virudhunagar District,4.The Section Officer, Criminal Record, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.(MD).No.635 of 2019K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J.sbnCrl.RC(MD)No.635 of 201921.08.20253/3
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.