✦ Madras High Court

R.Muthukrishnan v. The Managing Director

MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR

Case at a glance

Bench
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR

Outcome

Allowed

In the said circumstances, this writ petition is allowed and the respondent is directed to pay interest at the rate of 6% per annum for the ____________Page 2 of 4

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. In the said circumstances, this writ petition is allowed and the respondent is directed to pay interest at the rate of 6% per annum for the ____________Page 2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.15083 of 2026belated payment of the petitioner's terminal benefits, including Provident fund…

Judgment

W.P.(MD) No.15083 of 2026BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED : 08.06.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMARW.P.(MD) No.15083 of 2026R.Muthukrishnan ... Petitioner-vs-The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation(Thirunelveli) Limited,23/2, Kattaboman Nagar, Thirunelveli 627 011.... RespondentPRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to pay interest at the tare of 6% per annum for the belated payment of Provident fund, Gratuity, Leave Salary and EL Surrender from the date of reitrement to the date of actual payment within a time frame. For Petitioner: Mrs.D.RamyaFor Respondent: Mr.D.JebarajStanding counsel____________Page 1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.15083 of 2026

O R D E RMr.D.Jebaraj, learned Standing Counsel, takes notice for the respondent.

2.

With the consent of both sides, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage.

3.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsels appearing for the respondent.

4.

Learned counsel on either side unanimously agree that the issue involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by various Judgments passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.A.(MD).No.403 of 2010 and batch, dated 08.06.2014 and W.A.(MD).No.1419 of 2021 and batch, dated 26.07.2021.

Operative part

5.

In the said circumstances, this writ petition is allowed and the respondent is directed to pay interest at the rate of 6% per annum for the ____________Page 2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.15083 of 2026belated payment of the petitioner's terminal benefits, including Provident fund, Gratuity, Leave Salary, EL Surrender and other retirement benefits payable to the petitioner, from the date of his retirement till the date on which those benefits are paid to the petitioner. The respondent is further directed to comply with the said direction as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of five months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 08.06.2026 4/10NCC :Yes / NoIndex :Yes / NoInternet: Yes / Nosbn ToThe Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation(Thirunelveli) Limited,23/2, Kattaboman Nagar, Thirunelveli 627 011.____________Page 3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.15083 of 2026MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J.sbnW.P.(MD) No.15083 of 202608.06.20264/10____________Page 4 of 4

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: In the said circumstances, this writ petition is allowed and the respondent is directed to pay interest at the rate of 6% per annum for the ____________Page 2 of 4

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments