Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition stands dismissed
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 389(1)
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. The petitioner stands convicted and sentenced as under:-Section of LawSentence of imprisonment Fine amount302 IPCLife Imprisonment Rs.2,000/-, in default to undergo 6 months SI 3. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. 4. The petitioner has failed…
Judgment
Crl.M.P.(MD) No.8174 of 2025BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYANANDTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMYCRL.MP(MD) No.8174 of 2025inCrl.A(MD)No.702 of 2025 Karthick @ karthick Kumar : Petitioner/AppellantVs.The State of Tamil Nadu through the Inspector of Police, Kombai Police Station. (In Crime No.209/2019) : Respondent/Complainant Prayer : Petition filed under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner, in S.C.No.56 of 2020, dated 24/09/2024 by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, (FTC), Theni, and to enlarge the petitioner on bail, till the disposal of the above said Criminal Appeal. For Petitioner: Mr.J.William Christopher For Respondent: Mr..T.Senthil Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor____________Page 1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.(MD) No.8174 of 2025ORDER[Order of the Court was made by G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.]This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed seeking to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner by the Additional District and Sessions Judge,(FTC), Theni, in S.C.No.56 of 2020, dated 24/09/2024 and to enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the criminal appeal.
Operative part
The petitioner stands convicted and sentenced as under:-Section of LawSentence of imprisonment Fine amount302 IPCLife Imprisonment Rs.2,000/-, in default to undergo 6 months SI 3. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. 4. The petitioner has failed to make out a prima facie case for grant of suspension of sentence, hence we are of the opinion that it is not a fit case for grant of suspension of sentence to the petitioner. ____________Page 2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.(MD) No.8174 of 20255.Accordingly this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition stands dismissed. [G.K.I., J.] & [K.R., J.] 02.01.2026NCC :Yes / NoIndex :Yes / NoerTo,1.The Additional District and Sessions Judge, (FTC), Theni. 2. The Inspector of Police, Kombai Police Station, Theni District.
The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.____________Page 3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.(MD) No.8174 of 2025G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN , J.ANDKRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J . erCRL.MP(MD) No.8174 of 2025inCrl.A(MD)No.702 of 202502.01.2026____________Page 4 of 4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition stands dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 389(1).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.