✦ Madras High Court

Judgment · High Court

G ARUL MURUGAN

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

In view of the above, this Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. In view of the above, this Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. NCC :Yes / No12.06.2025Internet :Yes / NoIndex : Yes / NoLS2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.(MD)No.121 of 2025To1.The Subordinate Court, Aranthangi. 2. The District Munsif, Aranthangi.…

Judgment

S.A.(MD)No.121 of 2025BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED: 12.06.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGANS.A.(MD)No.121 of 20251.Sanmugavadivel2.Ramamoorthy ... Appellants/Appellants/ PlaintiffsVs.

1.

Kesavan2.Sanmugam ... Respondents / Respondents / Defendants PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 Cr.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 27.09.2018 made in A.S.No.82 of 2017 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Aranthangi, confirming the judgment and decree dated 12.03.2015 made in O.S.No.3 of 2005 on the file of the District Munsif, Aranthangi. For Appellants : No appearanceFor Respondents: No appearance for R1: Mr.V.Sakthi for R21/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.(MD)No.121 of 2025JUDGMENTWhen the second appeal was listed for hearing on 09.06.2025, there was no representation on the side of the appellants. Hence, the case was directed to be listed under the caption “for dismissal” on 12.06.2025.

2.

Even today (ie.12.06.2025), when the matter was listed under the caption “for dismissal”, there is no representation on the side of the appellants. It is evident that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal.

Operative part

3.

In view of the above, this Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. NCC :Yes / No12.06.2025Internet :Yes / NoIndex : Yes / NoLS2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.(MD)No.121 of 2025To1.The Subordinate Court, Aranthangi. 2. The District Munsif, Aranthangi. 3. The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.(MD)No.121 of 2025G.ARUL MURUGAN ,J. LSSA.(MD)No.121 of 202512.06.20254/4

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above, this Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 100.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments