Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
In the said circumstances, this writ petition is allowed and the respondents are directed to pay interest at the rate of 6% per annum for the belated payment of the petitioner's terminal and pension benefits, namely, EPF employee's contribution, gratuity, encashment of leaves and commutated value of pension, from the date of his retirement till the date on which the terminal and pension benefits a
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. In the said circumstances, this writ petition is allowed and the respondents are directed to pay interest at the rate of 6% per annum for the belated payment of the petitioner's terminal and pension benefits, namely, EPF employee's contribution, gratuity, encashment of leaves and…
Judgment
W.P.(MD) No.9732 of 2026BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED : 09.04.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMARW.P.(MD) No.9732 of 2026R.Chinnathambi ... Petitioner-vs-1.The Management of Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Madurai Region rep.by its Managing Director Madurai2.The Administrator Tamil Nadu State Transport Employees' Pension Fund Trust Thiruvalluvar Illam Anna Salai, Chennai-2... RespondentsPRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to to pay the petitioner interest at the rate of 18% per annum for the period of delay from 01.04.2025 to 10.03.2026, in paying the amounts paid towards his terminal and pension benefits, namely, EPF employee's contribution, gratuity, encashment of leaves ____________Page 1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.9732 of 2026and commutated value of pension, within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner: Mr.S.ArunachalamFor Respondents: Mr.K.RamaiahStanding Counsel for R1Mr.S.C.Herold SinghStanding Counsel for R2
O R D E RMr.K.Ramaiah, learned Standing Counsel, takes notice for the first respondent and Mr.S.C.Herold Singh, learned Standing Counsel, takes notice for the second respondent.
With the consent of both sides, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsels appearing for the respective respondents.
Learned counsel on either side unanimously agree that the issue involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by various Judgments ____________Page 2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.9732 of 2026passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.A.(MD) No.403 of 2010 and batch, dated 09.04.2014 and W.A.(MD) No.1419 of 2021 and batch, dated 26.07.2021.
Operative part
In the said circumstances, this writ petition is allowed and the respondents are directed to pay interest at the rate of 6% per annum for the belated payment of the petitioner's terminal and pension benefits, namely, EPF employee's contribution, gratuity, encashment of leaves and commutated value of pension, from the date of his retirement till the date on which the terminal and pension benefits are paid to the petitioner. The respondents are further directed to comply with the said direction as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of five months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 09.04.2026 (19/29)NCC :Yes / NoIndex :Yes / NoInternet: Yes / No krk____________Page 3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.9732 of 2026MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J.krkW.P.(MD) No.9732 of 202609.04.2026(19/29)____________Page 4 of 4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In the said circumstances, this writ petition is allowed and the respondents are directed to pay interest at the rate of 6% per annum for the belated payment of the petitioner's terminal and pension benefits, namely, EPF employee's contribution, gratuity, encashment of leaves and commutated value of pension, from the date of his retirement till the date on which the terminal and pension benefits a
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.