Shanthi v. State of Tamilnadu rep., by The Commissioner of Police, Trichy City, Trichy
Case at a glance
- Bench
- L VICTORIA GOWRI
Outcome
Disposed of
With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. 01.04.2026NCC: Yes / No Index :Yes / No2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl. (MD)No.1782 of 2026 RmkTO:-1.The Commissioner of Police, Trichy City, Trichy District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Palakkarai Police Station, Trichy District. 3. The Additional…
Judgment
W.P.Crl. (MD)No.1782 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED : 01.04.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRIW.P.Crl. (MD)No.1782 of 2026 Shanthi ... PetitionerVs.
State of Tamilnadu rep., by The Commissioner of Police, Trichy City, Trichy District.
The Inspector of Police, Palakkarai Police Station, Trichy District. ... RespondentsPRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 and 2 herein to conduct necessary enquiry and recovery petitioner's lost articles based on the CSR.No.466 of 2025 on the file of the second respondent dated 12.08.2025.For Petitioner : Mr.A.BanumathyFor Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.)ORDERSeeking to direct respondents 1 and 2 to conduct necessary enquiry and recover petitioner’s lost jewelry based on the C.S.R.No.466 of 2025 on the file of the second respondent dated 12.08.2025, this writ petition is filed.1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl. (MD)No.1782 of 20262.When the matter came up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (crl.side) appearing for the respondent police, on instructions, submitted that based on the complaint lodged by the petitioner that her bag with gold ornaments was lost at Lakshmi Homemade Murukku Shop, investigation was initiated and on obtaining CCTV footage, it revealed that the petitioner had taken away her handbag from the said Muruku Shop and hence, the enquiry is still pending. He further submitted that without a clear and specific statement from the petitioner identifying where she lost her bag, the question of progress in the investigation will not arise.
Heard either side and carefully perused the materials available on record.
Considering the submission made by the learned Government Advocate, the petitioner is directed to refresh her memory and give a further statement to the respondent police in order to facilitate the investigation.
Operative part
With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. 01.04.2026NCC: Yes / No Index :Yes / No2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl. (MD)No.1782 of 2026 RmkTO:-1.The Commissioner of Police, Trichy City, Trichy District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Palakkarai Police Station, Trichy District. 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl. (MD)No.1782 of 2026L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.RmkOrder made inW.P.Crl. (MD)No.1782 of 2026 Dated01.04.20264/4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.