D.Vadivel v. Virudhunagar District.3.The Administrator SP.SPL.134, Mathinaickenpatti Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society, Kullurchandai, Aruppukkottai
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
With the consent of both sides, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Without going into the merits of the case, and taking into consideration the fact that the order passed by the first respondent dated 17.12.2021 has attained finality, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the third respondent to implement the said…
Judgment
W.P.(MD)No.10170 of 2026BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED : 10.04.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMARW.P.(MD)No.10170 of 2026D.Vadivel ... PetitionerVs.
The Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies, O/o. the Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.
The Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies, O/o. the Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Aruppukkottai Circle, Virudhunagar District.
Operative part
The Administrator SP.SPL.134, Mathinaickenpatti Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society, Kullurchandai, Aruppukkottai Taluk, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents____________Page 1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.10170 of 2026PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service in the 3rd respondent society with back wages, continuity of service and all other attendant monetary and service benefits by considering his representation dated 11.12.2025.For Petitioner: Mr.S.BalamuruganFor Respondents : Mr.V.Om PrakashGovernment AdvocateO R D E RMr.V.Om Prakash, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents. 2. With the consent of both sides, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage.3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents.____________Page 2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.10170 of 20264. This writ petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into the service of the third respondent society, with back wages, continuity of service, and all other attendant monetary benefits.
When the matter was taken up for consideration, Mr. V. Om Prakash, learned Government Advocate, fairly submitted that the order passed in T.N.S.C. No. 1 of 2016, dated 17.12.2021, by the appellate authority under the Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, 1947, will be implemented by the third respondent within a period of four weeks from today.
Without going into the merits of the case, and taking into consideration the fact that the order passed by the first respondent dated 17.12.2021 has attained finality, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the third respondent to implement the said order dated 17.12.2021 within a period of four weeks from today. ____________Page 3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.10170 of 20267. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 10.04.2026Neutral Citation: Yes / NoIndex :Yes / NoamTo1.The Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies, O/o. the Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 2. The Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies, O/o. the Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Aruppukkottai Circle, Virudhunagar District. 3. The Administrator SP.SPL.134, Mathinaickenpatti Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society, Kullurchandai, Aruppukkottai Taluk, Virudhunagar District.____________Page 4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.10170 of 2026MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J.amW.P.(MD)No.10170 of 202610.04.2026____________Page 5 of 5
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With the consent of both sides, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, 1947.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.