High Court · 2025
Case Details
Cited in this judgment
CRL OP(MD). No.5023 of 2025BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )Date : 29/04/2025PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVELCRL OP(MD). No.5023 of 20251. Xavier Ignatius2. Rejish Kumar ... Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 2 VsThe State of Tamil Nadu,,Rep. by the Inspector of Police,Marthandam Police Station,Kanyakumari District.(In Crime No. 127 of 2025). ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : Mr.Anto Prince G, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSSPRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 127 of 2025 on the file of the respondent-Police.ORDER : The Court made the following order :- This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioners on 17.03.2025under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, praying1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.5023 of 2025to grant an order of pre-arrest bail.2. The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent-Police forthe offences punishable under Section 303(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS),2023 in Crime No.127 of 2025 on the file of the respondent-police.3. The case of the prosecution is that on 22.02.2025 at about 08.00 a.m., basedon the secret information, the respondent-police were patrolling to prevent the theftof sand near Nallur Brahmanikavilai. At that time, the police found that thepetitioners have illegally transported two units of gravel sand by using two tempovehicles bearing Registration No.TN-38-AD-9736 and TN-75-F-3556 without anyvalid license or permission. On seeing the Police, the petitioners fled from the placeleaving the vehicles behind. The Police seized the same. Hence, the case. 4. Mr.G.Anto Prince, the learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that thepetitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as allegedby the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He, however,submits that the petitioners are ready to abide by any conditions to be imposed bythis Court. He further submits that the petitioners are willing to deposit someamount to the Green Committee, Kanyakumari District. He therefore prays for grantof pre-arrest bail to the petitioners.5. Per contra, Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.5023 of 2025Side) appearing for the respondent-police, submits that the petitioners have illegallytransported two units of gravel sand by using two tempo vehicles bearingRegistration No.TN-38-AD-9736 and TN-75-F-3556 without any valid license orpermission. He further submits that there are seven previous cases against the firstpetitioner, out of which two cases are similar in nature and there are two previouscases pending against the second petitioner, out of which one case is similar innature. Accordingly, he prays to dismiss this Criminal Original Petition.6. Heard on both sides. This Court has perused the records. 7. The petitioners have permanent residence and deep roots in the society andtherefore, there is less possibility for absconding. Considering the same, and alsoconsidering the quantity of gravel sand allegedly transported by the petitioners, andconsidering the undertaking given by the petitioners that they are willing to depositsome amount to the Green Committee, Kanyakumari District, and with a view togive one more opportunity to reform themselves, this Court is inclined to grant anorder of pre-arrest bail to the petitioners subject to the following conditions.(i) The petitioners shall be released on bail in the event of their arrest or in theevent of their surrender before the learned Judicial Magistrate I, Kuzhithurai,Kanyakumari District, within a period of 15 days from the date on which the ordercopy is made ready, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.5023 of 2025Thousand only) each along with two sureties, each for a like sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate I,Kuzhithurai, Kanyakumari District,;(ii) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in theApplication for Suretyship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules ofPractice, 2019']. The learned Judicial Magistrate I, Kuzhithurai, KanyakumariDistrict, shall obtain a copy of any one of identity proofs to ensure their identity;(iii) The petitioners shall appear and sign before the respondent-Police daily at10.00 a.m. until further orders;(iv) The first petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty FiveThousand only) in favour of the District Green Committee, Kanyakumari District,without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the trial Court and producethe receipt / acknowledgment before the learned Judicial Magistrate I, Kuzhithurai,Kanyakumari District, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy ofthe order.(v) The petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by apolice officer as and when required;(vi) The petitioners shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement,threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.5023 of 2025dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;(vii) The petitioners shall not leave India without the previous permission ofthe Court;(viii) The petitioners shall furnish their residential address and mobile numberto the learned Judicial Magistrate I, Kuzhithurai, Kanyakumari District; (ix) The petitioners shall not, directly or indirectly, cause any threat to thewitnesses and shall not tamper the evidence; and(x) On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned JudicialMagistrate I, Kuzhithurai, Kanyakumari District, or Trial Judge, as the case may be,is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioners in accordance with lawas if the aforementioned conditions are imposed by them as laid down by theHon'ble Supreme Court in P.K. Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005) 13 SCC 283]. 8. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed subject to theconditions stated supra. Sd/-29/04/2025/ TRUE COPY //08/2024 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.I /II / III / IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.5023 of 2025TSG TO1.The Judicial Magistrate I, Kuzhithurai, Kanyakumari District.2.Do Through The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kanyakumari District.3.The Inspector of Police, Marthandam Police Station, Kanyakumari District.4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.+1 CC to M/s.G.ANTO PRINCE, Advocate ( SR-5049[I] dated 29/04/2025 ) ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.5023 of 2025 Date : 29/04/2025BV(27/05/2025) 6P/ 6CMadurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17.07.2023.6/6