Arumugasamy v. The District Collector, District Collectorate, Tenkasi District.2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Considering the above, the third respondent/Tahsildar, Kadayanallur Taluk, Tenkasi District, is directed to conduct enquiry as directed by the Revenue Divisional Officer and forward his report to the District Revenue Officer, Tenkasi District to enable the District Revenue Officer to pass final orders on…
Judgment
W.P.(MD) No.6685 of 2025BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.03.2025CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJIW.P.(MD) No.6685 of 2025 Arumugasamy... Petitionervs.
The District Collector, District Collectorate, Tenkasi District.
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Office, Tenkasi District.
The Tahsildar, Kadayanallur Taluk, Tenkasi District. ... RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 03.07.2024 and subsequent reminder dated 14.02.2025 and to issue patta in the name of the petitioner and other legal heirs. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Kavinprasanth For Respondents : Mr.M.Lingadurai Special Government Pleader1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.6685 of 2025ORDERConsidering the limited scope of the relief sought for in the writ petition, with the consent of the learned counsel on either side, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2. The petitioner seeks issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to dispose of his representations dated 03.07.2024 and 14.02.2025.3.Heard the learned counsel on either side.
Admittedly, the petitioner seeks to direct the respondents to effect changes in the survey number as it stood before UDR. The competent authority in this regard is the District Revenue Officer, Tenkasi District. Eventhough the District Revenue Officer, Tenkasi District, is not made a party in the writ petition, I find from the petition addressed to the District Collector, the Revenue Divisional Officer and the Tahsildar, by the petitioner, wherein he has stated that even during the lifetime of his father, he had approached the District Revenue Officer with a request to rectify the mistakes. According to the petitioner, the District Revenue Officer had forwarded the said application of the petitioner's 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.6685 of 2025father to the Revenue Divisional Officer and the Tahsildar, Kadayanallur Taluk, Tenkasi District, to conduct an enquiry and forward a report. It is the grievance of the petitioner that despite the said direction issued by the District Revenue Officer, the Tahsildar has not taken any steps and hence, the petitioner has been constrained to move this Court seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus.
Operative part
Considering the above, the third respondent/Tahsildar, Kadayanallur Taluk, Tenkasi District, is directed to conduct enquiry as directed by the Revenue Divisional Officer and forward his report to the District Revenue Officer, Tenkasi District to enable the District Revenue Officer to pass final orders on merits and in accoardance with law on the request for correction of the survey number in the UDR records. The third respondent shall complete the said exercise within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 13.03.2025sjiNCC: Yes/NoIndex :Yes / NoInternet: Yes / No3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.6685 of 2025P.B.BALAJI , J. sjiTo1.The District Collector, District Collectorate, Tenkasi District. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Office, Tenkasi District. 3. The Tahsildar, Kadayanallur Taluk, Tenkasi District. Copy4.The District Revenue Officer, Tenkasi District.W.P.(MD) No.6685 of 202513.03.20254/4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.