Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
In view of the above submission, this writ petition is disposed of by leaving it open to the petitioner to file an appeal before the competent civil Court
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 s. 34
Judgment
W.P.(MD)No.5596 of 2026BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED :27.02.2026CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDERW.P.(MD)No.5596 of 20261. V.S. Girejaa2. V.S.Amaradhan3. S.Madhan ... Petitioner(s) Vs.
The District Collector, Collectorate Office, Collectorate, Trichy - 1.
The Authorized Officer / District Revenue Offcer, National Highways, Land Acquisition, Trichy.
The Planning Director, Indian National Highways Committee, Collectorate, Trichy -1.... RespondentsPRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to enhance the compensation amount as per the present market value of the property measuring 4155 Sq. meter comprised in new T.S.No.41/5 at Panchapur Village, New Ward AN, Block No.2, Tiruchirappalli West Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District based on the Petitioners representation 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.5596 of 2026dated 05.12.2025.For Petitioner: Mr.D. BoopalFor Respondents: Mr.N.Ramesh Arumugam Government Advocate
Operative part
O R D E RWhen the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner intends to file an application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the competent civil court. He seeks liberty to file such an application. 2. In view of the above submission, this writ petition is disposed of by leaving it open to the petitioner to file an appeal before the competent civil Court. No costs. (K.SURENDER, J) 27.02.2026NCC:Yes/NoInternet: Yes/NoIndex: Yes/NoPKN2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.5596 of 2026To1. The District Collector, Collectorate Office, Collectorate, Trichy - 1.2. The Authorized Officer / District Revenue Offcer, National Highways, Land Acquisition, Trichy.3. The Planning Director, Indian National Highways Committee, Collectorate, Trichy -1.3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.5596 of 2026K.SURENDER, J. PKNW.P.(MD)No.5596 of 202627.02.20262/24/4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above submission, this writ petition is disposed of by leaving it open to the petitioner to file an appeal before the competent civil Court
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 34.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.