✦ Madras High Court

Ramarajan v. Officer

R VIJAYAKUMAR

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

With the above said observations, this writ petition stands disposed of

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. With the above said observations, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 24.02.2026 NCC : Yes/NoIndex : Yes/NoInternet: Yes/NoRJRTo 1. The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, New Municipal Complex, Thillai Nagar 7th Cross, Tiruchirappalli - 620 018.2. The Passport Officer, Plot No.…

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED: 24.02.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMARW.P.(MD)No.5001 of 2026 Ramarajan ...Petitioner Vs 1. The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, New Municipal Complex, Thillai Nagar 7th Cross, Tiruchirappalli - 620 018.

2.

The Passport Officer, Plot No. A5, Salai Road, Sastri Road Junction, Thilllai Nagar, Tiruchirappalli – 620 018.

3.

The Inspector of Police, Ponnamaravathy Police Station, Pudukkottai District. Cr.No.136 of 2024. ... RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of MANDAMUS, directing the 1st Respondent to issue fresh passport to the petitioner based on his application in file No.TR2066288628026 dated 23.01.2026 within the stipulated time limit as fixed by this Court.1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis For Petitioner : M/s.N.PalaniyandiFor Respondents: M/s.M.Aasha Government Advocate(crl.side)for R3 ORDERThe present writ petition has been filed seeking a mandamus directing the first respondent to issue fresh passport to the petitioner based upon his application dated 23.01.2026. 2. The learned Government Advocate(crl.side) appearing for the third respondent brought to the notice of the Court that the petitioner has been implicated in a criminal case in Cr.No.136 of 2024 on the file of the third respondent which has culminated in filing of a charge sheet in C.C.No.61 of 2024 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Ponnamaravathy. 3. Considering the above said facts, the petitioner is directed to approach the concerned trial Court seeking permission of the Court to go abroad. In case if any such application is filed, the same shall be disposed of within a period of 4(four) weeks. Based upon the orders to be passed, the trial Court is directed to proceed in accordance with law.2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Operative part

4.

With the above said observations, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 24.02.2026 NCC : Yes/NoIndex : Yes/NoInternet: Yes/NoRJRTo 1. The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, New Municipal Complex, Thillai Nagar 7th Cross, Tiruchirappalli - 620 018.2. The Passport Officer, Plot No. A5, Salai Road, Sastri Road Junction, Thilllai Nagar, Tiruchirappalli – 620 018.3. The Inspector of Police, Ponnamaravathy Police Station, Pudukkottai District. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis R.VIJAYAKUMAR , J. RJRW.P.(MD)No.5001 of 202624.02.20264/4

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: With the above said observations, this writ petition stands disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments