✦ Madras High Court

Gurusamy v. The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul.2.The Tahsildar, Dindigul West

HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands dismissed, granting liberty to the petitioner to file a Public Interest Litigation in accordance with law, if he is otherwise entitled to do so

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. The Executive Officer, Agaram Town Panchayat, Agaram, Thadikombu, Dindigul District...RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to forbear the respondents from constructing the Fair Price Shop in the temple lands…

Judgment

W.P(MD)No.4652 of 2026BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED: 04.03.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDARWrit Petition(MD)No.4652 of 2026 Gurusamy.. PetitionerVs 1. The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2.

The Tahsildar, Dindigul West Taluk, Dindigul.

Operative part

3.

The Executive Officer, Agaram Town Panchayat, Agaram, Thadikombu, Dindigul District...RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to forbear the respondents from constructing the Fair Price Shop in the temple lands comprised in Survey Nos.1905/1 and 1905/3 situated at Rengappanur Agaram Village, Thadikombu, Dindigul District.1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.4652 of 2026 For Petitioner : Mr.J.VishnuFor Respondents : Mr.P.SubbarajSpl. Govt. Pleader for R1 and R2 Mr.Suriyaganth for R3ORDERThe relief sought in this Writ Petition is in the nature of a Public Interest Litigation. The petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents not to construct a Fair Price Shop within the temple premises, claiming that he is a devotee of the said temple.2. Since the relief sought is essentially in the nature of a Public Interest Litigation, the present Writ Petition filed in an individual capacity is not maintainable.3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands dismissed, granting liberty to the petitioner to file a Public Interest Litigation in accordance with law, if he is otherwise entitled to do so. No costs.04.03.2026 NCC : Yes/NoIndex : Yes/NoInternet: Yesskn2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.4652 of 2026 To1.The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2. The Tahsildar, Dindigul West Taluk, Dindigul. 3. The Executive Officer, Agaram Town Panchayat, Agaram, Thadikombu, Dindigul District. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.4652 of 2026 HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J. skn Writ Petition(MD)No.4652 of 2026 04.03.2026 4/4

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands dismissed, granting liberty to the petitioner to file a Public Interest Litigation in accordance with law, if he is otherwise entitled to do so

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments