Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
716 of 2025injunction application, the revision petition stands disposed of with a direction to the learned Sub Judge, Lalkudi, is directed to dispose of O
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. With the above said observations, this Civil Revision Petition stands disposed of. No costs.07.03.2025 Internet: Yes/NoIndex: Yes/NoRJRTo1.The Second Additional District Judge, Trichy. 2. The learned Sub Judge, Lalkudi. Copy to:-The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.716…
Judgment
C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.716 of 2025BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED: 07.03.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMARC.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.716 of 2025 Sri Jegadambika Rice Mill, Represented by its ManagingPartner Chandrasekar ...Petitioner/Appellant/Petitioner/PlaintiffVs.
P.V.Jayaraman2.Sedhuraman ... Respondents/Respondents/Respondents/DefendantsPRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decree order made in C.M.A.No.20 of 2022 in I.A.No.01 of 2019 in O.S.No.68 of 2019 on the file of 2nd Additional District Judge, Trichy, dated 19.11.2024 by allowing this revision. For Petitioner: Mr.R.Sundar * * * * *1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.716 of 2025 ORDERThe plaintiff in O.S.No.68 of 2019, on the file of the Sub Court, Lalkudi, has filed the present revision petition, challenging the dismissal of interim injunction application which was confirmed by the appellate Court.
A perusal of the records reveal that the revision petitioner had filed the above said suit for the relief of permanent injunction. Pending suit, the plaintiff had filed I.A.No.1 of 2019, seeking interim injunction. The trial Court had dismissed the said application on the ground that the plaintiff has not established a prima facie case. Challenging the same, the plaintiff had filed C.M.A.No.20 of 2022, on the file of the II Additional District Court, Tiruchirappalli. The learned First Appellate Judge had also concurred with the findings of the trial Court, had dismissed the appeal. Challenging the concurrent findings, the present revision petition has been filed.
Operative part
A perusal of the records further reveals that the suit is for permanent injunction and therefore, any observation that is made by this Court in the present revision petition will affect the merits of the suit. In view of the above said facts, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the interim 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.716 of 2025injunction application, the revision petition stands disposed of with a direction to the learned Sub Judge, Lalkudi, is directed to dispose of O.S.No.68 of 2019, on or before 31.12.2025, without being influenced by any of the observations made in the interim injunction application.
With the above said observations, this Civil Revision Petition stands disposed of. No costs.07.03.2025 Internet: Yes/NoIndex: Yes/NoRJRTo1.The Second Additional District Judge, Trichy. 2. The learned Sub Judge, Lalkudi. Copy to:-The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.716 of 2025R.VIJAYAKUMAR , J. RJRC.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.716 of 202507.03.20254/4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: 716 of 2025injunction application, the revision petition stands disposed of with a direction to the learned Sub Judge, Lalkudi, is directed to dispose of O
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.