✦ Madras High Court

Judgment · High Court

R VIJAYAKUMAR

Case at a glance

Bench
R VIJAYAKUMAR

Outcome

Disposed of

With the above said observations, this writ petition stands disposed of

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. In view of the above said facts, the petitioner is directed to produce the recent property tax receipt and other documents before the authority and file a fresh application. On production of these records, the respondents are directed to dispose of the same within…
  • Para 44. With the above said observations, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.03.02.2026NCC : Yes/NoIndex : Yes/NoInternet: Yes/NoRJR2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis To1. The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Srirangam, Trichy District.2. The Assistant Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Thiruvanaikovil, Trichy District.3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis R.VIJAYAKUMAR…

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED: 03.02.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMARW.P.(MD)No.2653 of 2026R.Kamaraj...Petitioner Vs 1. The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Srirangam, Trichy District.

2.

The Assistant Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Thiruvanaikovil, Trichy District. ...RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 2nd respondent to provide a new Electric Connection for Domestic purpose based on petitioner's representation dated 08.01.2026 within stipulated time. For Petitioner : M/s.T.NatarajaFor Respondents: Mr.S.Deenadhayalan Standing Counsel1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ORDERThe present writ petition has been filed seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent to provide new electricity service connection for domestic purpose based upon the petitioner's representation dated 08.01.2026. 2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the application presented by the petitioner has been cancelled on the ground that the petitioner has not produced the recent records to establish his title and possession.

3.

In view of the above said facts, the petitioner is directed to produce the recent property tax receipt and other documents before the authority and file a fresh application. On production of these records, the respondents are directed to dispose of the same within a period of 2(two) weeks from the date of production of the said records.

Operative part

4.

With the above said observations, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.03.02.2026NCC : Yes/NoIndex : Yes/NoInternet: Yes/NoRJR2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis To1. The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Srirangam, Trichy District.2. The Assistant Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Thiruvanaikovil, Trichy District.3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis R.VIJAYAKUMAR , J. RJRW.P.(MD)No.2653 of 202603.02.20264/4

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: With the above said observations, this writ petition stands disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments