S.Karthik Suryaraj v. Agastheeswaram
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
This writ petition is disposed of accordingly
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Valson Bose... Respondents1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.1806 of 2025 Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the Impugned order in Letter No.Ko59/10/2024 dated 06.01.2025 on the file of…
Judgment
W.P(MD)No.1806 of 2025BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED: 24.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN andTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHIW.P(MD)No.1806 of 2025andW.M.P(MD)Nos.1291 & 1292 of 2024S.Karthik Suryaraj... Petitioner Vs.
The District Collector, Collectorate, Kanyakumari District.
The Tahsildar, Agastheeswaram Taluk, Kanyakumari District.
The Assistant Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, Palayaru Irrigation Sub Division, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.
Operative part
Valson Bose... Respondents1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.1806 of 2025 Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the Impugned order in Letter No.Ko59/10/2024 dated 06.01.2025 on the file of the Respondent No.3 and quash the same as illegal and consequently restraining the respondents from taking any coercive steps in the name of removal of encroachment without conduct the survey and fix the four boundary for the petitioner's dwelling house in Survey No.170/1A1A2 and the alleged encroachment Channel in Survey No.122/5, Therekalpudur Village, Agastheeswaram Taluk, Kanyakumari District. For Petitioner : Mr.I.PinaugashFor Respondents: Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader for R.1 to R.3 ORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Special Government Pleader informed us that the impugned notice will be withdrawn. 2. The authorities are directed to abide by the directions given earlier by us in W.P(MD)No.30883 of 2024 dated 19.12.2024. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.1806 of 20253.This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. [G.R.S., J.] [B.P., J.] 24.01.2025NCC: Yes / NoInternet: Yes / NoIndex : Yes / NoMGATo1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Kanyakumari District. 2. The Tahsildar, Agastheeswaram Taluk, Kanyakumari District. 3. The Assistant Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, Palayaru Irrigation Sub Division, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.1806 of 2025G.R.SWAMINATHAN, Jand B.PUGALENDHI, J.MGAW.P(MD)No.1806 of 202524.01.20254/4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: This writ petition is disposed of accordingly
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.