Rajamani v. Jothimani
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In view of the above, this Second Appeal is dismissed as abated
Judgment
Operative part
S.A.(MD)No.467 of 2011BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED : 26.03.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P. VADAMALAIS.A.(MD)No.467 of 2011 Rajamani .. AppellantVs.Jothimani.. RespondentPrayer : Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 22.12.2009 made in A.S.No.92 of 2007 on the file of the Sub Court, Periyakulam, confirming the judgment and decree dated 27.08.2007 made in O.S.No.153 of 2006 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Periyakulam. For Appellant: Mr.C.Christopher, Advocate For Respondent: No AppearanceJUDGMENTToday, this matter is listed under the caption “For Dismissal”.1/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.(MD)No.467 of 20112. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the sole appellant, upon producing a copy of the death certificate of the sole appellant, submitted that the sole appellant, namely Rajamani, died on 18.05.2015 and that the sole appellant has no legal heirs.3. In view of the above, this Second Appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs.26.03.2026Index: Yes/No Speaking Order :Yes/NoNeutral Citation: Yes/Nomkn2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.(MD)No.467 of 2011P. VADAMALAI , J. mknTo1.The Sub Court, Periyakulam. 2. The District Munsif Court, Periyakulam.S.A.(MD)No.467 of 201126.03.20263/3
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.