Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In view of the above submission coupled with the endorsement, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Arulsamy4.Andavan5.Sivamalai6.Jothi7.Tamilselvi8.Kalaiselvi9.Neduncheiyan... Respondents1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.31679 of 2018 Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 12.11.2018 and further direct the second respondent not…
Judgment
W.P.No.31679 of 2018IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 01.07.2024CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD W.P.No.31679 of 2018 and W.M.P.No.21801 of 2020S.Muthazhagan ... Petitioner Vs.
The District Collector, Collectorate, Ariyalur, Ariyalur District.
The Thasildhar, Andimadam Taluk, Ariyalur District.
Operative part
Arulsamy4.Andavan5.Sivamalai6.Jothi7.Tamilselvi8.Kalaiselvi9.Neduncheiyan... Respondents1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.31679 of 2018 Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 12.11.2018 and further direct the second respondent not to transfer the Patta in the name of the third to ninth respondents herein to the properties situated in Survey No.227/4B to an extent of 16 cents in Andimadam Village Account, Udayarpalam Taluk, Ariyalur District, till the final disposal of S.A.No.1178 of 2005, pending on the file of this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Ramesh For Respondents: For R1 & R2: M/s.R.L.Karthika Government AdvocateFor R3, R5, R7 & R8: Notice unservedFor R4, R6 & R9: No appearance ORDERWhen the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submitted that the relief sought for herein has become infructuous and hence, nothing survives for adjudication in this Writ Petition and also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.31679 of 20182. In view of the above submission coupled with the endorsement, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 01.07.2024Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/NoSpeaking Order/Non-Speaking OrderNeutral Citation : Yes/NoarbTo1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Ariyalur, Ariyalur District. 2. The Thasildhar, Andimadam Taluk, Ariyalur District.3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.31679 of 2018J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD , J. arbW.P.No.31679 of 2018 and W.M.P.No.21801 of 202001.07.2024 4/4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above submission coupled with the endorsement, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.