✦ High Court of India · 17 Dec 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 17 Dec 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
17 Dec 2025
Length
1,085 words

WA Nos.3869, 3884, 3988, 3989 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 17.12.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,CHIEF JUSTICEANDTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGANWA Nos.3869, 3884, 3988, 3989 of 2025WA No.3869 of 2025Ganesan Kandasamy: Appellant versus1.P.Velusamy2.The District Collector Tirupur District District Collectorate Building Tiruppur641 6043.The Revenue Divisional Officer Tiruppur Tiruppur Dist.4.The Tahsildar Tiruppur South Tk Tiruppur Dist.5.The Commissioner Tiruppur Municipal Corporation Tirupur 641 6046.The Block Development Officer Tiruppur Panchayat Union, Tiruppur 641 6017.The Special Officer Mudalipalayam Panchayat, Mudalipalayam Village, Tiruppur 641 6068.The District Environmental Engineer Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board Tirupur.Page 1 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA Nos.3869, 3884, 3988, 3989 of 20259.P. Muthukumar10.T. Yuvaraj11.R.Sathish Kumar (P in P)12.K. Balasubramaniam13.M.Palanisamy14.Mangalam Grama Neeranai Payanpaduthovor Sangam Rep.by its President R.Thangavel No.3/80, Chinnakkalipalayam Iduvai Village, Tiruppur South Tk.: RespondentsPrayer: Appeal filed to set aside the order passed by learned Single Judge, dated 09.12.2025 in W.P.No.37431/2025.For Appellant:Mr.Srinath Sridevan,Senior Counsel,for Mr.P.S.PrabuFor Respondents : Mr.A.Edwin Prabhakar, State Government Pleader for respondents 2 to 4Mr.P.S.Raman,Advocate General,assisted by Mr.Abishek Murthy,Standing counsel, for R-5Ms.Shabnam Banu,for Mr.Karthik Raja, for R-14Mr.Suchindran, Standing counsel, for R-8Mr.S.Lakshmanasamy, For R-9Mr.Yogeshwaran, for R-10Mr.P.M.Duraiswamy, for R-13WA No.3884 of 2025Mangalam Grama NeeranaiPayanpaduthovor Sangam Rep.by its President R.Thangavel : Appellant versusPage 2 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA Nos.3869, 3884, 3988, 3989 of 20251.P.Velusamy2.The District Collector Tirupur District District Collectorate Building Tiruppur641 6043.The Revenue Divisional Officer Tiruppur Tiruppur Dist.4.The Tahsildar Tiruppur South Tk Tiruppur Dist.5.The Commissioner Tiruppur Municipal Corporation Tirupur 641 6046.The Block Development Officer Tiruppur Panchayat Union, Tiruppur 641 6017.The Special Officer Mudalipalayam Panchayat, Mudalipalayam Village, Tiruppur 641 6068.The District Environmental Engineer Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board Tirupur.9.P. Muthukumar10.T. Yuvaraj11.R.Sathish Kumar (P in P)12.Ganesh Kandasamy13.K. Balasubramaniam14.M.Palanisamy: RespondentsPrayer: Appeal filed to set aside the order passed by learned Single Judge, dated 09.12.2025 in W.P.No.37431/2025.For Appellant:Ms.Shabnam Banu,for Mr.Karthik RajaFor Respondents : Mr.A.Edwin Prabhakar, State Government Pleader for respondents 2 to 4Page 3 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA Nos.3869, 3884, 3988, 3989 of 2025Mr.P.S.Raman,Advocate General,assisted by Mr.Abishek Murthy,Standing counsel, for R-5Mr.Srinath Sridevan, Senior Counsel,for Mr.P.S.Prabu, for R-12Mr.S.Lakshmanasamy, For R-9Mr.P.M.Duraiswamy, for R-14Mr.Yogeshwaran, for R-10WA No.3988 of 2025P.Muthukumar: Appellant versus1.P.Velusamy2.The District Collector Tirupur District District Collectorate Building Tiruppur 641 6043.The Revenue Divisional Officer Tiruppur Tiruppur Dist.4.The Tahsildar Tiruppur South Tk Tiruppur Dist.5.The Commissioner Tiruppur Municipal Corporation Tirupur 641 6046.The Block Development Officer Tiruppur Panchayat Union, Tiruppur 641 6017.The Special Officer Mudalipalayam Panchayat, Mudalipalayam Village, Tiruppur 641 6068.The District Environmental Engineer Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board Tirupur.Page 4 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA Nos.3869, 3884, 3988, 3989 of 20259.T. Yuvaraj10.R.Sathish Kumar11.Ganesh Kandasamy12.K. Balasubramaniam13.M.Palanisamy14.Mangalam Grama Neeranai Payanpaduthovor Sangam Rep.by its President R.Thangavel No.3/80, Chinnakkalipalayam Iduvai Village, Tiruppur South Tk.: RespondentsPrayer: Appeal filed to set aside the order passed by learned Single Judge, dated 09.12.2025 in W.P.No.37431/2025.For Appellant:Mr.S.LakshmanasamyFor Respondents : Mr.Srinath Sridevan,Senior Counsel,for Mr.P.S.Prabu, for R-1Mr.A.Edwin Prabhakar, State Government Pleader for respondents 2 to 4Mr.P.S.Raman,Advocate General,assisted by Mr.Abishek Murthy,Standing counsel, for R-5Ms.Shabnam Banu,for Mr.Karthik Raja, for R14Mr.P.M.Duraiswamy, for R-13Mr.Yogeshwaran, for R-9WA No.3989 of 2025M.Palanisamy: Appellant versus1.P.Velusamy2.The District Collector Tirupur District District Collectorate Building Page 5 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA Nos.3869, 3884, 3988, 3989 of 2025 Tiruppur641 6043.The Revenue Divisional Officer Tiruppur Tiruppur Dist.4.The Tahsildar Tiruppur South Tk Tiruppur Dist.5.The Commissioner Tiruppur Municipal Corporation Tirupur 641 6046.The Block Development Officer Tiruppur Panchayat Union, Tiruppur 641 6017.The Special Officer Mudalipalayam Panchayat, Mudalipalayam Village, Tiruppur 641 6068.The District Environmental Engineer Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board Tirupur.9.P. Muthukumar10.T. Yuvaraj11.R.Sathish Kumar (P in P)12.Ganesan kandasamy13.K.Balasubramaniam14.Mangalam Grama Neeranai Payanpaduthovor Sangam Rep.by its President R.Thangavel No.3/80, Chinnakkalipalayam Iduvai Village, Tiruppur South Tk.: RespondentsPrayer: Appeal filed to set aside the order passed by learned Single Judge, dated 09.12.2025 in W.P.No.37431/2025.For Appellant:Mr.P.M.DuraiswamyFor Respondents : Mr.A.Edwin Prabhakar, State Government Pleader for respondents 2 to 4Mr.P.S.Raman,Advocate General,Page 6 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA Nos.3869, 3884, 3988, 3989 of 2025assisted by Mr.Abishek Murthy,Standing counsel, for R-5Mr.Srinath Sridevan,Senior Counsel,for Mr.P.S.Prabu, for R-12Ms.Shabnam Banu,for Mr.Karthik Raja, for R-14Mr.S.Lakshmanasamy, For R-9Mr.Yogeshwaran, for R-10COMMON JUDGMENT(Judgment of the Court was delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)Detailed interim order passed by the learned Single Judge is challenged in these intra court appeals on the ground that the learned Single Judge while passing the interim order, has not appreciated that the site is not cleared under any clearance order of the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, and it is near agricultural fields. It is also submitted that there is also a canal passing through nearby.2. We find that the learned Single Judge has passed a very detailed interim order, taking into consideration various submissions made before him. We also find that permission for dumping of municipal garbage is permitted only for a period of six months. The Page 7 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA Nos.3869, 3884, 3988, 3989 of 2025order impugned also imposes conditions with regard to the manner it will be used. Timely inspection has also been ensured. The learned Single Judge has also ordered that Tiruppur Municipal Corporation shall commence the process for establishment of MCC and MRF in those locations immediately, clarifying that the present site is only temporary in nature and once it reaches the storing capacity threshold, it shall stop using the site. We also find that the learned Single Judge, by way of abundant caution, has also gone to the extent of ordering that the waste stored at Iduvai should be removed within a period of six months from 11.12.2025.3. We do not think protection more than that is needed to be granted while passing an interim order by the learned Single Judge.4. The scope of interference in an intra court appeal against an interim order is extremely narrow and limited to seeing whether the order is patently illegal and it would be in the interest of justice to interfere. Normally, interim orders passed by writ Court in exercise of discretionary jurisdiction are not required to be interfered with in an intra court appeal.Page 8 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA Nos.3869, 3884, 3988, 3989 of 20255. The appeals are without any merits and are, therefore, dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. Consequently, CMP Nos.31693, 31616, 32386, 32384 of 2025 are closed. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ.) (G. ARUL MURUGAN, J.) 17.12.2025 Index: Yes/NoNeutral Citation: Yes/NotarTo1.The District Environmental Engineer Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, Tirupur.2.The District Collector Tirupur District Tiruppur641 6043.The Revenue Divisional Officer Tiruppur Tiruppur Dist.4.The Tahsildar Tiruppur South Tk Tiruppur Dist.5.The Commissioner Tiruppur Municipal Corporation Tirupur 641 6046.The Block Development Officer Tiruppur Panchayat Union, Tiruppur 641 6017.The Special Officer Mudalipalayam Panchayat, Mudalipalayam Village, Tiruppur 641 606 Page 9 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA Nos.3869, 3884, 3988, 3989 of 2025THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICEAND G. ARUL MURUGAN , J. (tar) WA Nos.3869 of 2025 etc. 17.12.2025Page 10 of 10

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments