✦ Madras High Court

Sudalaimani Pichaimuthu v. The Principal Secretary to the Government

G ARUL MURUGAN, F JUSTICEAND G ARUL MURUGAN

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

The petition stands disposed of

Provisions considered

Judgment

WP No.50802 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 07.01.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,CHIEF JUSTICEANDTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGANWP No.50802 of 2025 Sudalaimani Pichaimuthu: Petitionerversus1.The Principal Secretary to the Government, School Education Department, St.George Fort, Chennai 600 0092.The Director, Directorate of Matriculation Schools, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai 600 0063.The Joint Director (Hr.Sec) DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai 600 0064.The Sacred Heart Matriculation Higher Secondary School rep. By its Principal Ms.Janet Abraham, No.11, Devaraj Nagar, 2nd Cross Street, Sholinganallur, Chennai 600 1195.The Sacred Heart Matriculation Higher Secondary School rep. By its Principal Dr.Rex Abramam, Loaganathan Main Street, Nehru Nagar, Nanmangalam, Chennai 600 129.: Respondents Page 1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.50802 of 2025 Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing respondents 1 to 3 to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 03.11.2025 and to take proper action against respondents 4 and 5.

Operative part

For Petitioner: Mr.A.BalakumarFor Respondents : Mr.M.Habeeb rahman, Government Advocate, for respondents 1 to 3ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)Complaint regarding irregularities in the functioning of schools run by respondents 4 and 5 has been made through this public interest litigation.2. We find that the petitioner has made complaint to the concerned authorities on 03.11.2025 and thereafter, this petition has been filed on 05.12.2025.Page 2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.50802 of 20253. Therefore, at this stage, we are not inclined to entertain this petition. It is open for the authorities to examine the complaint by holding inquiry in that regard.4. The petition stands disposed of. There will be no order as to costs. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ.) (G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.)07.01.2026Index: Yes/NoNeutral Citation: Yes/NotarTo1.The Principal Secretary to the Government, School Education Department, St.George Fort, Chennai 600 0092.The Director, Directorate of Matriculation Schools, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai 600 0063.The Joint Director (Hr.Sec) DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai 600 006Page 3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.50802 of 2025THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICEAND G.ARUL MURUGAN , J. (tar) WP No.50802 of 202507.01.2026Page 4 of 4

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The petition stands disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments