Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
WP No. 46010 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 17-12-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMARWP No. 46010 of 2025and WMP.Nos.51314, 51315 & 51319 of 20251. E.Kumudha2.E.BalakumarPetitioner(s)VsThe Tamil Nadu Housing BoardRep. By The Executive Engineer Cum Administrative Officer, Anna Nagar Division, Tnhb Shopping Complex, Thirumangalam Chennai 35Respondent(s)PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, calling for the records of the order passed by the respondent in Letter bearing No. ANA.2 / 1096/ 2022 dated 8.05.2024 and quash the same and any such consequent GST demands and direct the respondent board to adjust the amount of Rs. 6,36,850/- i.e. 5 percent of the flat cost paid as last installment which was allocated towards GST by the Respondent Board towards the final installment for flat No. 479/75 (10th floor).For Petitioner(s):Ms.A.Vidyafor M/s.Viruksham LegalFor Respondent(s):Mr.D.Veerasekaran, Standing CounselORDERWMP.No.51314 of 2025 has been filed to permit the petitioners to file a joint single writ petition.
This petition is ordered, on payment of single court fee. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 46010 of 20252. This petition has been filed challenging the letter bearing No.ANA.2/1096/2022 dated 8.05.2024, quash the same and any such consequent GST demands and direct the respondent board to adjust the amount of Rs. 6,36,850/- i.e., 5 percent of the flat cost paid as last installment which was allocated towards GST by the Respondent Board towards the final installment for flat No. 479/75 (10th floor).3. The main grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner has paid all the installments. When she paid the last instalment to the tune of Rs.6,36,850/-, the same has been received by the respondent Board, when the petitioner necessitated for handing over the plot, at that stage, the receipt was issued to the petitioner by the Board as if the amount has been adjusted towards GST. Hence, seeks for a direction.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that installment amount has been paid on 03.04.2025 and the receipt was issued on 04.04.2025. In the meanwhile, taking note of the fact that there was a stay by the Division Bench of this Court not to collect 5% GST, now, the receipt has been issued as if amount the amount is adjusted to GST. 5. Counter has been filed stating that the petitioner has not paid 8 instalments. According to him, amount equal to the last installment is paid only https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 46010 of 2025towards the GST. 6. Though it it is stated by the respondent that the amount of Rs.6,36,850/- was collected towards the GST. When the Court posed a question as to whether the said amount was remitted to GST Council, the learned standing counsel could not answer and he submitted that said amount will be adjusted towards the last instalment and the condition sale deed would be executed in favour of the writ petitioner.
Such statement is recorded. 7. It is relevant to note that a Division Bench of this Court in the case of The Executive Engineer-cum-Administrative Officer, Anna Nagar Division vs. N.Ramaswamy in W.A.Nos.2565 of 2025 etc., batch cases vide order dated 28.08.2025 has passed the following directions:-4. In order to balance the convenience of both parties, as an interim arrangement, the following orders are passed: (i) that the Tamil Nadu Housing Board shall execute sale deeds for the remaining writ petitioners / respondents if they are otherwise eligible to get the sale deeds registered in their favour without demanding 5% additional GST. (ii) It is made clear that, ultimately if the Tamil Nadu Housing Board succeeds in the batch of intra Court appeals, whatever the decision to be made by the Court, the parties shall abide by that and in that case, if any decision is taken in favour of Tamil Nadu Housing Board that their demand of additional GST to the extent of maximum 5% is to be collected, the allottees who are going to get the sale deeds executed by virtue of this order shall without any hesitation to make the payment.
Operative part
Only on that condition, the sale deed as directed above shall be executed by the Tamil Nadu Housing Board. Insofar as the direction given in paragraph No.22(ii) for refunding of extra 5% collected from some https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 46010 of 2025of the writ petitioners who have already paid 5% additional GST is concerned, that direction alone is hereby stayed. This order shall confine only to the writ petitioners whose cases are covered under the impugned order dated 02.06.2025.8. Such view of the matter, the respondent shall execute the sale deed in favour of the petitioners within a period of two weeks and with regard to the payment of additional 5% GST, the same shall be collected subject to the outcome of the orders to be passed by Division Bench of this Court. 9. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions stand closed.
17-12-2025dhkIndex: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet: YesNeutral Citation: Yes/NoTo1.The Executive Engineer Cum Administrative OfficerThe Tamil Nadu Housing BoardAnna Nagar Division, Tnhb Shopping Complex, Thirumangalam Chennai 35 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 46010 of 2025N.SATHISH KUMAR J.dhkWP No. 46010 of 2025 17-12-2025
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.