T.Thulasidharan v. The Managing Director
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
W.P.No.43722 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 17.11.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYANW.P.No.43722 of 2025T.Thulasidharan ... PetitionerVs1. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Ltd., 3/137, Salamedu, Villupuram – 605 602.2. The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Ltd., Vellore Region, Rangapuram, Vellore – 632009.3. The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees' Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai – 600002.... RespondentsWrit Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pay interest to the petitioner at the rate of 8% per annum for the belated payment 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.43722 of 2025of his provident fund, earned leave salary, gratuity and pension commutation amount within a time limit to be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Manoj KumarFor Respondents : Mrs.S.Pavithra, Standing Counsel (for R1 & R2) Mr.C.S.K.Sathish, Standing Counsel (for R3)O R D E RThis Writ Petition has been filed for direction directing the respondents to pay appropriate interest to the petitioner for the delayed sanction and disbursement of retirement benefits.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record.3. In identical issues, this Court has passed various orders, justifying the payment of interest to the aggrieved pensioners and in the order dated 13.12.2019 in W.P.(MD) No.26481 of 2019, the following order came to be passed :-2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.43722 of 2025“5. I am not in agreement with the said representation made. There was already a duty cast on the respondent Corporation to pay the terminal benefits on the date of retirement itself and the very fact that the belated disbursement of retirement benefit, had already put the retired employee to serious prejudice, entertaining the present request for disbursement of the interest on the belated payment in installments, could cause further prejudice to the retired employee. 6. In the light of the above observations, there shall be a direction to the respondent / Corporation to pay the penal interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the belated payment of the retirement benefits for the period from the date of the retirement, till the date of the actual disbursement, as expeditiously as possible and in any event, not before the expiry of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.4. This Court is of the view that the respondents could be directed to pay the interest on the belated payment, at the rate of 6% per annum, as ordered in the above writ petition.3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.43722 of 20255. In the light of the above findings, there shall be a direction to the respondents herein to pay the interest on the belated payment of the terminal benefits to the petitioner at the rate of 6% per annum, commencing from the date of the retirement, till the date of actual disbursement, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.6. With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.17.11.20251/2 Index:Yes/NoNeutral Citation/Yes/Nokv4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.43722 of 2025To1. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Ltd., 3/137, Salamedu, Villupuram – 605 602.2. The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Ltd., Vellore Region, Rangapuram, Vellore – 632009.3. The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees' Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai – 600002.5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.43722 of 2025G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.kvW.P.No.43722 of 202517.11.20251/2 6/6
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.