Ellammal v. The Managing Director
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the appellant, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 s. 173
Judgment
Operative part
C.M.A.No.3565 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 06.02.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADIC.M.A.No.3565 of 2025 Ellammal ... AppellantVs.The Managing Director, Metropolitan Transport Co., Limited.,No.2, Pallavan House, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. ... RespondentPrayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, pleased to set aside the decree and judgment dated 16.11.2024 in M.C.O.P. No.1403 of 2020 on the file of the Motor accident Claims Tribunal, ( IV Court of Small Causes) Chennai. For Appellant : Mr.K.VaradhakamarajFor Respondent : No appearance JUDGEMENTWhen the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.3565 of 2025K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI,J.vsn2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the appellant, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.06.02.2026Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Nonspeaking orderNetrual Citation Case : Yes / NovsnTo1.The IV Judge, Small Causes Court, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chennai2.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.C.M.A.No.3565 of 20252/2
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the appellant, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 173.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.