S.Sasikala v. NT SERVICE DEPARTMENT
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Tamilnadu Government Servants (Condition of Service) Act, 2016 s. 50(1)(2)(3)
- Tamilnadu Government Servants (Condition of Service) Act s. 50(1)(2)(3)
Key paragraphs
- Para 22.The petitioner while working as Anganwadi Worker, she submitted resignation letter on 03.04.2023 due to her family circumstances. Immediately it was accepted and the petitioner was relieved from service. However, within a period of 24 days, she submitted withdrawal of resignation letter on 27.04.2023. However…
Judgment
W.P.No.43599 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 14.11.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYANW.P.No.43599 of 2025S.Sasikala ... PetitionerVs.
THE COMMISSIONER,INTEGRATED CHILD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT, TARAMANI, CHENNAI-600 1132.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT, KRISHNAGIRI3.THE DISTRICT PROJECT OFFICER,INTEGRATED CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, KELAMANGALAM, KRISHANGIRI... RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent herein to consider and pass orders on the petitioner’s representation dated 29.05.2023 and 12.06.2023 in the light of Sec.50(1)(2)(3) of Tamilnadu Government Servants (Condition of Service) Act 2016 for reinstatement of the petitioner in service as Anganwadi Worker by cancelling the relieving order dated 12.05.2023 passed by the 2nd respondent in accordance with law within a stipulated time fixed by this Court. For Petitioner: Mr.R.Thamaraiselvan1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.43599 of 2025 For Respondents: Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan, Special Government Pleader
O R D E RThis writ petition has been filed for direction to the second respondent to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner seeking reinstatement of the petitioner into service as Anganwadi Worker by cancelling the relieving order dated 12.05.2023.
Operative part
The petitioner while working as Anganwadi Worker, she submitted resignation letter on 03.04.2023 due to her family circumstances. Immediately it was accepted and the petitioner was relieved from service. However, within a period of 24 days, she submitted withdrawal of resignation letter on 27.04.2023. However, without considering the same, the petitioner was relieved from the service with effect from 31.05.2023. Therefore, the petitioner submitted representation to consider her withdrawal letter seeking withdrawal of resignation request as per Section 50(1)(2)(3) of Tamilnadu Government Servants (Condition of Service) Act. 2016. Further, the petitioner repeatedly submitted representation and it is pending without consideration.2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.43599 of 20253.In view of the above, the second respondent is directed to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner seeking reinstatement into service and to dispose of the same on merits and in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of this order. 4. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 14.11.2025Neutral citation: Yes/No Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderlok3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.43599 of 2025G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.lokTo1.THE COMMISSIONER,INTEGRATED CHILD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT, TARAMANI, CHENNAI-600 1132.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT, KRISHNAGIRI3.THE DISTRICT PROJECT OFFICER,INTEGRATED CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, KELAMANGALAM, KRISHANGIRIW.P.No.43599 of 202514.11.20254/4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Tamilnadu Government Servants (Condition of Service) Act, 2016 — s. 50(1)(2)(3); Tamilnadu Government Servants (Condition of Service) Act — s. 50(1)(2)(3).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.