Judgment · High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 20.11.2025CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANANW.P.No. 44058 of 2025 and WMP.Nos.4 9160 & 4 9161 of 2025 Innovative Interiors Private LimitedNew No.10B Mathiazhagan NagarK.K.Nedunchalai, SaligramamChennai - 600 093 ….Petitioner Vs.

National Faceless Assessment Centre Delhi2.The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Corp. Cirlce 1 (1)M.G.Road, Nungambakkam Chennai 600 034 . ..RespondentsPrayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the respondents in the impugned order dated 30.09.2025 bearing DIN.No.ITBA/AST/S/147/2025-26/1081365932(1) and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.C.J.Yeswanthram for Mr.K.Vaitheeswaran For Respondent : Mr.B.Ramanakumar ____________Page No. 1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Senior Standing Counsel ORDERMr.B.Ramanakumar, learned Senior Standing Counsel takes notice for the Respondent.

This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the time of admission with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Government Advocate for the Respondent.

This is the second round of litigation before this court. In this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the impugned assessment order dated 30.09.2025 whereby the orders have been passed under Section 147 r/w 144-B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Earlier also, the petitioner had suffered an order dated 29.03.2022 for the very same tax period and the petitioner has successfully challenged the same before this court in WP.No.10185 of 2022.____________Page No. 2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

By an order dated 07.04.2025, this court had recorded the submissions of the learned Senior Standing Counsel and remitted the case back to the respondent to pass a fresh order after affording the petitioner a reasonable opportunity of being heard and by permitting the petitioner to cross examine the person from whom statements were recorded by the Income Tax Department.

It appears that the petitioner has failed to alter the present e-mail ID which is in use and thus, the e-mail was sent to the old e-mail I.D which do not access to the petitioner. It is under these circumstances, the impugned order has been passed.

Learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent would submit that it is an incumbent on the part of the petitioner to have altered the e-mail ID in the web portal and therefore, the Officer of the Income Tax Department cannot be found fault for having passed the impugned order dated 30.09.2025 by way of rejoinder.____________Page No. 3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

The learned counsel for the petitioner would draw the attention to the communication dated 29.09.2025 wherein it was informed by the counsel that the Department would be taking time for extension of time specified in the order passed by this court in W.P.No.10185/2022 vide order dated 07.04.2025

Having considered the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the Learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent.

This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.20.11.2025Neutral Citation : Yes / NogvTo:1.National Faceless Assessment Centre Delhi2.The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Corp. Cirlce 1 (1)M.G.Road, Nungambakkam Chennai 600 034W.P.No. 44058 of 2025 and WM P.Nos.4 9160 & 4 9161 of 2025 ____________Page No. 5 of 5