✦ Madras High Court

Prem Textiles v. The Inspector General of Registration

4 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Remanded

2023 issued by the 7th respondent is hereby quashed and the matter is remanded back to the 7th respondent for fresh consideration of the petitioner’s application seeking for issuance of patta for the property morefully described in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition, after giving due consideration to the fact that the petitioner has paid the deficit stamp duty as demanded u/s 47A

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55.The Sub Registrar, Taluk Office Campus, Arakkonam – 631 001. Page No.1 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.40338 of 20256.Thasildar, Arakkonam, Ranipet District. 7. Zonal Deputy Thasildar, Arakkonam, Ranipet District.... RespondentsPrayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of…

Judgment

W.P.No.40338 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 06.01.2026CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSEW.P.No.40338 of 2025andW.M.P.No.45306 of 2025 Prem Textiles, Represented by its Proprietrix Mrs. Girija KV,No.208/209, 3rd Cross, Royal Shelters, Devarachikkanahalli, Bangalore South, Karnataka – 560 076.... PetitionerVs.

1.

The Inspector General of Registration, 100, Santhome High Road, Pattinapakkam, Chennai – 600 028.

2.

The Deputy Inspector General of Registration, Integrated Building of Registration Department, Veppamara Street, Velppadi, Vellore – 632 001.

3.

Special Collector (Stamps), NH-40, Ranipet Collector Office, Ranipet, Tamil Nadu – 632 401.

4.

The District Registrar, Integrated Building of Registration Department, No.230, 5th Gandhi Road, Swalpet, Gandhi Road, Arakkonam – 631 001.

5.

The Sub Registrar, Taluk Office Campus, Arakkonam – 631 001. Page No.1 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.40338 of 20256.Thasildar, Arakkonam, Ranipet District. 7. Zonal Deputy Thasildar, Arakkonam, Ranipet District.... RespondentsPrayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the Application No.2023/0103/37/245610 dated 20.06.2023 issued by the 7th respondent quash the same, and consequentially direct the 5th respondent to transfer patta forthwith in favour of the petitioner on the basis of the registered sale deed dated 06.05.2022.For Petitioner: Ms.Jayanthi K ShahFor Respondents: Mr.D.RavichanderSpecial Government Pleader*****ORDERThis writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 20.06.2023 passed by the 7th respondent, rejecting the petitioner’s application seeking for issuance of patta for the property more fully described in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition.2.

The petitioner has challenged the impugned order on the ground that the impugned order is a non-speaking order and has been issued by total non-application of mind to the fact that the petitioner has complied with the Page No.2 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.40338 of 2025directions issued u/s 47A of the Stamps Act (in short ‘the Act’) by paying the deficit stamp duty for the subject sale deed through which the petitioner become the absolute owner of the property.3. A counter has also been filed by the 5th respondent on behalf of the respondents 1, 2 and 4 and in paragraph No.7, the 5th respondent has categorically stated that the petitioner has paid the deficit stamp duty as demanded u/s 47A of the Act, and has also obtained a sale deed in their favour, which is dated 06.05.2022, registered as Doc. No.1786 of 2022 in the office of Sub Registrar, Arakkonam. However, as seen from the impugned order, the aforesaid fact has not been considered, but by a non-speaking order, the petitioner’s application seeking for issuance of patta in their favour has been rejected.

Operative part

Since the impugned order is a non-speaking order, as the order has not considered the fact that the petitioner has already obtained the sale deed for the property more fully described in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition by paying deficit stamp duty as demanded u/s 47A of the Stamp Act, this Court is of the considered view that the impugned order has to be quashed and the matter has to be remanded back to the 7th respondent for fresh consideration on merits and in accordance with law, after giving due consideration to the fact that the petitioner has paid the deficit stamp duty as demanded u/s 47A of the Stamp Page No.3 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.40338 of 2025 Act and has also obtained a sale deed dated 06.05.2022 registered as Doc. No.1786 of 2022 in the office of Sub Registrar, Arakkonam.4. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 20.06.2023 issued by the 7th respondent is hereby quashed and the matter is remanded back to the 7th respondent for fresh consideration of the petitioner’s application seeking for issuance of patta for the property more fully described in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition, after giving due consideration to the fact that the petitioner has paid the deficit stamp duty as demanded u/s 47A of the Stamp Act and also after giving due consideration to the sale deed obtained by the petitioner dated 06.05.2022 registered as Doc.

No.1786 of 2022 in the office of Sub Registrar, Arakkonam. The 7th respondent is directed to pass final orders on the petitioner’s application seeking for issuance of patta, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.5. With the aforesaid directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.06.01.2026Index : Yes / NoSpeaking order / Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation Case : Yes/NospPage No.4 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.40338 of 2025To1.The Inspector General of Registration, 100, Santhome High Road, Pattinapakkam, Chennai – 600 028.2.The Deputy Inspector General of Registration, Integrated Building of Registration Department, Veppamara Street, Velppadi, Vellore – 632 001.3.The Special Collector (Stamps), NH-40, Ranipet Collector Office, Ranipet, Tamil Nadu – 632 401.4.The District Registrar, Integrated Building of Registration Department, No.230, 5th Gandhi Road, Swalpet, Gandhi Road, Arakkonam – 631 001.5.The Sub Registrar, Taluk Office Campus, Arakkonam – 631 001.

6.

The Thasildar, Arakkonam, Ranipet District.

7.

The Zonal Deputy Thasildar, Arakkonam, Ranipet District. Page No.5 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.40338 of 2025ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. spW.P.No.40338 of 202506.01.2026Page No.6 of 6

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: 2023 issued by the 7th respondent is hereby quashed and the matter is remanded back to the 7th respondent for fresh consideration of the petitioner’s application seeking for issuance of patta for the property morefully described in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition, after giving due consideration to the fact that the petitioner has paid the deficit stamp duty as demanded u/s 47A

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226; Indian Stamp Act, 1899 — s. 47A.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments