✦ High Court of India · 07 Nov 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 07 Nov 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
07 Nov 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,043 words

W.P.No.39085 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 07.11.2025CORAM THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANANW.P.No.39085 of 2025Rohithkumar.... PetitionerVs1.The Principal Secretary Housing and Urban Development Department St.George Fort, Secretariat Chennai – 600 009.2.The Director Directorate of Town and Country Planning 2nd, 3rd & 4th Floor, C & E Market Road Koyambedu, Chennai – 600 107.3.The Assistant Director Town and Country Planning District Collector Office Campus Thiruvarur – 610 004.4.The Member Secretary Local Planning Authority Office District Collector Office Campus Thiruvarur – 610 004. .... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 4 to 1/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.39085 of 2025release the petitioner's land with total extent of 7 acres 9 cents situated in Town Survey No.23/1B, 23/3, 23/4A, 23/4B, 24/1A, 24/1B, 24/1C, 24/3, 24/4 and 24/5, Perumpugalur Village, Nannilam Taluk, Thiruvarur District by treating the “Thiruvarur Master Plan of 100 feet ring road” as lapsed under Section 38 of Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act 1971, within a stipulated time that may be fixed by this Court and pass orders.For Petitioner : Mr.R.KarunanidhiFor Respondents : Mr. M.Shahjahan Special Government PleaderORDERThe petitioner had purchased the properties situated in Survey Nos. 23/1B, 23/3 and 23/4A, Perumpugalur Village, Nannilam Taluk, Thiruvarur District, from one Jaikumar Christhurajan. The sale was registered in Doc.No.1988 of 2025 on the file of Sub Registrar at Thiruvarur, on 04.04.2025. Thereafter, the petitioner had purchased the adjacent land in Survey No.23/4B of the same village from one Leema, on the very same date. This document is registered as Doc.No.1980 of 2025. A third purchase was made by him from his first vendor, Mr.Jaikumar Christhurajan, for the property situated in Sy.No.24/1A, 24/1B, 24/1C, 24/3, 24/4 and 24/5 of Perumpugalur Village. This document was registered as Doc.No.1986 of 2/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.39085 of 20252025.2. The petitioner approached respondents 3 and 4 for the purpose of regularising and obtaining approval to proceed further with its development. At this stage, he was informed by the respondents that the land situtated in Survey Nos. in 23/1B, 23/3, 23/4A, 23/4B, 24/1A, 24/1B, 24/1C, 24/3, 24/4 and 24/5 have been earmarked for 100 ft. ring road under Development Plan for Thiruvarur. On verification, the petitioner came to know that the Master Plan was gazetted on 21.04.2005. As no further steps had been taken under Section 37 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, the petitioner is before this Court, seeking the aforesaid relief. 3. As the area of dispute is in a very narrow compass, I requested Mr.M.Shahjahan, learned Special Government Pleader to take notice on behalf of the respondents and place instructions before this Court. 4. When the matter was called today, Mr.M.Shahjahan produced the instructions received from the third respondent, the Assistant Director, District Town and Country Planning Office, Thiruvarur. Paragraph No.9 of 3/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.39085 of 2025the instructions states that the area had been earmarked for the formation of 100 ft., ring road, in order to cater to the needs of the persons belonging to the economically weaker sections, and that certain individuals have also come forward to hand over certain portions of the land for the formation of ring road, so as to enable development of the Town in a proper and good manner. It also reveals that neither the Government of Tamil Nadu nor the Thiruvarur Local Planning Authority, took any steps to acquire the lands pursuant to the notification issued by the Government on 21.04.2005. The instructions also call upon the petitioner to comply with the online requirements to enable the third respondent to make recommendations to the Director of Town and Country Planning, Chennai, for the release of the land.5. I have carefully considered the arguments on either side and I have gone through the records. 6. In terms of Section 36 of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, a Town Planning Authority is entitled to reserve certain portions of land for the development of Town covered under the same. If such a notification is issued by virtue of that section, the area reserved is deemed to be for the 4/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.39085 of 2025public purpose of acquisition of lands. By a mere fact of issuance of development plan, the property does not automatically vest with the local body or with the Government.7. After notification of lands reserved under Section 36, under Section 37, the authority can either negotiate with the owner and acquire title or resort to compulsory acquisition and take over title of the property. The statute grants three years time to the Government to do the needful. In case, the acquisition or negotiation is not completed within the period of three years under Section 38 of the Act, the reservation is deemed to lapse. 8. The instructions given to the learned Special Government Pleader by the third respondent calls upon the petitioner to apply for the release of land. Such a procedure is unknown to the Town and Country Planning Act. When the legislature has declared that the reservation is deemed to lapse, there is no power vested in the Town and Country Planning Authority to seek for an application to release the land, and thereafter, passes an order of release. On the expiry of three years, the land is automatically released from the clutches of reservation so made. That being the position of law, the writ petition 5/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.39085 of 2025succeeds and the property covered under No.23/1B, 23/3, 23/4A, 23/4B, 24/1A, 24/1B, 24/1C, 24/3, 24/4 and 24/5, Perumpugalur Village, Nannilam Taluk, Thiruvarur District, is deemed to have been released from the Master Plan of the Thiruvarur Town, published on 21.04.2025. 9. Accordingly, the writ petition stands allowed. No costs.07.11.2025Index : Yes / NoSpeaking order / Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes / Nods6/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.39085 of 2025To:1.The Principal Secretary Housing and Urban Development Department St.George Fort, Secretariat Chennai – 600 009.2.The Director Directorate of Town and Country Planning 2nd, 3rd & 4th Floor, C & E Market Road Koyambedu, Chennai – 600 107.3.The Assistant Director Town and Country Planning District Collector Office Campus Thiruvarur – 610 004.4.The Member Secretary Local Planning Authority Office District Collector Office Campus Thiruvarur – 610 004.7/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.39085 of 2025V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN,J.dsW.P.No.39085 of 202507.11.20258/8

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments