✦ Madras High Court

G.S.F.Ahajahan v. V.M.Amanullah2.Samsath Begum3.Mathina Nasreen4.Haseena Nasreen5

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

With the above observation, the civil revision petition is dismissed

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. With the above observation, the civil revision petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.29.01.2026srIndex:yes/noWebsite:yes/noSpeaking Order/Non-speaking OrderTo1. The Subordinate Court, Tiruvarur2.The District Munsif Court, Tiruvarur3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No.250 of 2026P.B.BALAJI.,JsrCRP No.250 of 202629.01.20264/4

Judgment

CRP No.250 of 2026IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.B. BALAJICRP No.250 of 2026 and CMP No.1182 of 2025G.S.F.Ahajahan ... PetitionerVs.

1.

V.M.Amanullah2.Samsath Begum3.Mathina Nasreen4.Haseena Nasreen5,Shaik Mushakeer6.Mohamed Aasief … RespondentsCivil Revision Petition filed under Section 25 of Tamil Nadu Buildings Lease and Rent Control Act, 1960 against the judgment and decree made in RCA No.11 of 2018 daetd 01.07.2025 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Tiruvarur confirming RCOP NO.15 of 2015 dated 28.09.2018 on the file of District Munsif Court, Tiruvarur. For Petitioner: Mr.S.AnbalaganFor Respondent: Mr.Bhagawat Krishna 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No.250 of 2026ORDERThe connected revision petitions filed by the tenants have already been considered and dismissed by this Court. When it was pointed out to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner sought for similar indulgence to be shown to the revision petitioner as well, granting time to vacate till 30.06.2026.

2.

In fact, today, an affidavit/tenant dated 20.01.2026 is also filed undertaking to vacate the tenanted premises by 30.06.2026.

3.

It is fairly conceded by Mr.Bhagawat Krishna, learned counsel for the respondents that a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-(Rupees One Lakh Only) is available to be refunded to the petitioner across handing over the vacant possession on or before 30.06.2026.

4.

It is made clear that the petitioner shall continue to pay the monthly rent at the rate of Rs.5,000/-(Rupees Five Thousand Only) without any 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No.250 of 2026default and across vacating and handing over vacant possession, the advance of Rs.1,00,000/-(Rupees One Lakh Only) shall be refunded.

Operative part

5.

With the above observation, the civil revision petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.29.01.2026srIndex:yes/noWebsite:yes/noSpeaking Order/Non-speaking OrderTo1. The Subordinate Court, Tiruvarur2.The District Munsif Court, Tiruvarur3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No.250 of 2026P.B.BALAJI.,JsrCRP No.250 of 202629.01.20264/4

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: With the above observation, the civil revision petition is dismissed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Tamil Nadu Buildings Lease and Rent Control Act, 1960 — s. 25.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments