✦ Madras High Court

Judgment · High Court

Judgment

W.M.P. No.41892 of 2024 in W.P. No.38700 of 2024W.M.P. No.41892 of 2024 in W.P. No.38700 of 2024M.SUNDAR, J.andK.RAJASEKAR, J.(Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.)Captioned 'Writ Miscellaneous Petition' [hereinafter 'WMP' for the sake of brevity] has been filed with a prayer to dispense with production of 'original proceedings issued by the third respondent dated 18.11.2024' [hereinafter 'impugned communication' for the sake of brevity, convenience and clarity].2.Learned counsel for writ petitioner submits that the original impugned communication is not readily available with the petitioner at the time of filing of this writ petition but photocopy of the impugned communication is filed along with the typed set of papers and that has necessitated the captioned WMP.3.In the light of the narrative thus far, dispense with prayer is acceded to. Captioned WMP is ordered as prayed for.[M.S., J.] [K.R.S., J.] 02.01.2025cad1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.M.P. No.41892 of 2024 in W.P. No.38700 of 2024M. SUNDAR., J.andK. RAJASEKAR, J.cadW.M.P. No.41892 of 2024inW.P. No.38700 of 202402.01.20252/2

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments