High Court · 2025

W.P Nos. 40599, 40606 and 40610 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-10-2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMARANDTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDARW.P Nos. 40599, 40606 and 40610 of 2025 ANDWMP Nos.45521, 45528, 45530, 45533, 45534 and 45520 of 2025W.P.No.40599 of 2025MalligaW/o.Rajendaran, No.4/118, G.S.T. Road, Old Otteri, Vandalur, Vandalur Taluk, Chengalpet District... Petitioner in W.P.40599 of 2025GovindharajS/o.Kannan, No.4/118, G.S.T. Road, Old Otteri, Vandalur, Vandalur Taluk, Chengalpet District... Petitioner in W.P.No.40606 of 2025GanapathiS/o.Kannan, No.4/117, G.S.T. Road, Old Otteri, Vandalur, Vandalur Taluk, Chengalpet District...Petitioner in W.P.No.40610 of 2025Vs1.The District CollectorCollectorate Buildings, Chengalpet District.2.3.The District Revenue Officer,__________Page 1 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P Nos. 40599, 40606 and 40610 of 2025Voc Nagar, Ammanambakkam, Chengalpattu District.4.The Revenue Divisional Officer,Kadaperi, Tambaram, Chennai.5.The TahsildarVandalur Taluk Office, Otteri Peerakankaranai, Chennai.6.The Revenue InspectorVandalur Taluk, Chengalpet District.7.8.J.SudhakarS/o.Jagannathan, No.4/119, Vandalur Old Ottteri, Grand Trunk Road(GST Road) Chennai-600 048...Respondents in all the writ petitionsPrayer in W.P.No.40599 of 2025 : Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the proceedings of the 4th respondent vide NA.KA 2038/ 2024/ Aa1 dated 13.08.2025 and quash same as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and consequently direct the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 24.02.2025 and 28.04.2025 seeking for issuance of a patta in respect of land in Survey No.221 situated at Old Otteri, Vandalur, Vandalur Taluk, Chengalpet District and pass appropriate orders within stipulated time as that may be fixed by this Court.Prayer in WP No. 40606 of 2025: Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamuscall for the records of the proceedings of the 4th respondent vide NA.KA 2038/ 2024/ Aa1 dated __________Page 2 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P Nos. 40599, 40606 and 40610 of 202513.08.2025 and quash same as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and consequently direct the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 24.02.2025, 27.02.2025 and 28.04.2025 seeking for issuance of a patta in respect of land in Survey No.221 situated at Old Otteri, Vandalur, Vandalur Taluk, Chengalpet District and pass appropriate orders within stipulated time as that may be fixed by this Court.Prayer in WP No. 40610 of 2025: Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the proceedings of the 4th respondent vide NA.KA 2038/ 2024/ Aa1 dated 13.08.2025 and quash same as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and consequently direct the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 28.04.2025 seeking for issuance of a patta in respect of land in Survey No.221 situated at Old Otteri, Vandalur, Vandalur Taluk, Chengalpet District and pass appropriate orders within stipulated time as that may be fixed by this CourtIn all W.Ps.For Petitioners :Mr.N.UmapathiFor Respondents :Ms.M.JayanthyAdditional Government PleaderCommon Order(Order of the Court was made by R.Suresh Kumar J.) Since the issue raised in all these writ petitions are inter-connected, with the consent of the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Additional __________Page 3 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P Nos. 40599, 40606 and 40610 of 2025Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, all these writ petitions are taken up together and are disposed of by way of a common order.2. In each of the writ petition, the order passed under Section 6 of the Land Encroachment Act (Act 3 of 1905) issued by the Revenue Tahsildar is under challenge. Since there is an appeal provision available under the said Act under Section 10 to prefer the appeal before the appellate authority ie., Collector of the District concerned as against the order passed under Section 6 of the Land Encroachment Act, since the petitioners have approached this Court directly by filing the present writ petitions without filing statutory appeal, which being the effective alternative remedy we are of the view that, these writ petitions can be disposed of by giving liberty to the respective writ petitioners to file an appeal before the appellate authority within the time frame.3. In that view of the matter, this Court is inclined to dispose of these writ petitions with the following orders.(a)These writ petitions are not entertained in view of the clear appellate provisions available in the Land Encroachment Act.(b)It is open to the respective writ petitioner to prefer an appeal against the impugned orders in each of the writ petition before the appellate authority viz., District Collector within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.__________Page 4 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P Nos. 40599, 40606 and 40610 of 2025(c)In respect of the writ petitioner in W.P.No.40599 of 2025 is concerned, though Section 6 order dated 13.08.2025 has been issued in the name of one Rajendran, who is none other than the husband of the petitioner Malliga and the said Rajendran is no more, in respect of this writ petition is concerned, the writ petitioner Malliga is permitted to file the appeal as against the order of the Revenue Tahsildar dated 13.08.2025 under Section 6 of the Land Encroachment act, which is impugned in these writ petitions.(d)On filing of these appeals, the District Collector who is the appellate authority / the first respondent in these writ petitions is hereby directed to decide the said appeals as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of such appeals.(e)It is open to the respective petitioners to seek for an interim order of stay also against the order under Section 6 of the Land Encroachment Act before the appellate authority and in case any such interim applications are filed seeking for such stay, the same can be decided by the appellate authority within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of such applications.(f)Till such time, no coercive steps shall be taken against the writ petitioners.__________Page 5 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P Nos. 40599, 40606 and 40610 of 20254. With the above directions, these writ petitions are disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.(R.S.K.,J.) (H.C.,J.) 28-10-2025Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation: Yes/NoKSTTo1.The District CollectorCollectorate Buildings, Chengalpet District.2.3.The District Revenue Officer,Voc Nagar, Ammanambakkam, Chengalpattu District.4.The Revenue Divisional Officer,Kadaperi, Tambaram, Chennai.5.The TahsildarVandalur Taluk Office, Otteri Peerakankaranai, Chennai.6.The Revenue InspectorVandalur Taluk, Chengalpet District.__________Page 6 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P Nos. 40599, 40606 and 40610 of 2025__________Page 7 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P Nos. 40599, 40606 and 40610 of 2025R.SURESH KUMAR J.ANDHEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR J.KSTWP Nos. 40599, 40606 and40610 OF 202528-10-2025__________Page 8 of 8