✦ Madras High Court

B.Fayaz v. The State: The Inspector of Police, Singarapettai Police Station, Singarapettai.2.Athavullah

N ANAND VENKATESH

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

This criminal original petition is disposed of accordingly

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. This criminal original petition is disposed of accordingly.28.02.2024Index: Yes/NoInternet: Yes/NoSpeaking Order/Non-Speaking OrderssrTo1.The Inspector of Police, Singarapettai Police Station, Singarapettai. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Crl.O.P No.4514 of 2024

Judgment

1IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.02.2024CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESHCrl.O.P No.4514 of 2024B.FayazPetitionervs.

1.

The State: The Inspector of Police, Singarapettai Police Station, Singarapettai.

2.

Athavullah RespondentsPRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the 1st respondent police to provide necessary Police Protection to survey his land comprised in S.No.44/1 to an extent of 0.40.5 cents situated at Mahanoor Patti Village, Uthangarai Taluk, Krishnagiri District by the Taluk Surveyor. For Petitioner: Mr.S.Sathish RajanFor Respondent: Mr.A.Damodaran Additional Public Prosecutor for R1ORDERThis criminal original petition has been filed to direct the 1st respondent police to provide necessary Police Protection to survey his land comprised in S.No.44/1 to an extent of 0.40.5 cents situated at Mahanoor Patti Village, Uthangarai Taluk, Krishnagiri District by the Taluk Surveyor. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2N. ANAND VENKATESH, J. ssr2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondents.

3.

The petitioner is directed to give a fresh complaint/representation before the 1st respondent police in-person along with all the relevant documents and the 1st respondent shall act upon the same and conduct an enquiry and take a final decision, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the complaint from the petitioner.

Operative part

4.

This criminal original petition is disposed of accordingly.28.02.2024Index: Yes/NoInternet: Yes/NoSpeaking Order/Non-Speaking OrderssrTo1.The Inspector of Police, Singarapettai Police Station, Singarapettai. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Crl.O.P No.4514 of 2024

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: This criminal original petition is disposed of accordingly

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments