✦ Madras High Court

Judgment · High Court

Judgment

CMP.No.1348 of 2024in CMA.SR.No.87532 of 2022KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.This petition is filed to condone the delay of 6 days in filing the CMA.2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner/appellant.3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that notice has been served privately to the respondents and he has filed the proof of service also. 4.However, none appeared on behalf of the respondents.5.Therefore, the delay of 6 days in filing the appeal is condoned and the petition is accordingly, allowed.6.The Registry is directed to number the appeal, if the papers are otherwise in order. 19.02.2024Tsg

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments