M.Vedamuthu v. Indian Overseas Bank, Central Office
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Though the petitioner claims that he is the son and clause 1 legal heir of the deceased Anjala Mary @ Anjel Mary, no piece of paper is produced by the petitioner showing that he is the legal heir of the deceased. He has not…
Judgment
W.P.No.36119 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 23.09.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANIW.P.No.36119 of 2025M.Vedamuthu... PetitionerVs.
Indian Overseas Bank, Central Office, Rep. by its Chief Manager, Having office at No.763, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.
Indian Overseas Bank, Branch Office, Rep. by its Chief Manager, Saligramam Branch, Saligramam, Chennai – 600 093.... RespondentsPrayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein to release the funds/ deposit monies held by the petitioner's aforesaid deceased Anjala Mary @ Anjel Mary with accrued interest if any to petitioner directly or transfer it to petitioner's savings account bearing No.35060100006742, Bank of Baroda Bank, Rajakilapakkam – Page No.1 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.36119 of 2025 Sembakkam Branch, Chennai, based on the representation dated 27.06.2025.For Petitioner: Mr.A.Rajendra KumarFor Respondents: Notice dispensed with*****ORDERThe petitioner seeks a direction upon the respondents to release the money saved by his mother, which is lying in the bank of the 2nd respondent.2. Since no adverse order has been passed against the respondents, notice to the respondents is dispensed with.
The petitioner claims that he is the clause 1 legal heir of his deceased mother Anjala Mary @ Angel Mary. According to the petitioner, his mother died due to ill-health on 19.10.2021 at Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital. After her demise, the petitioner made a representation to the respondent-bank to release the amount lying in the credit of his mother. Since there was no response from the Page No.2 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.36119 of 2025respondent-bank, the petitioner made a representation dated 27.06.2025 before the respondents seeking release of funds held by his mother. As the said representation was not acted upon by the respondents, the petitioner has approached this Court by way of this writ petition for appropriate orders.
Operative part
Though the petitioner claims that he is the son and clause 1 legal heir of the deceased Anjala Mary @ Anjel Mary, no piece of paper is produced by the petitioner showing that he is the legal heir of the deceased. He has not even enclosed the legal heirship certificate issued by the revenue authorities. Upon the demise of a parent, a legal heirship certificate is the only document, which would prove the relationship between the parties and also the legal right. In the absence of the same, the petitioner cannot expect the authorities to act upon his representation and release the huge funds maintained by his mother. Hence, the prayer sought for by the petitioner cannot be granted and this writ petition is liable to be dismissed. Page No.3 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.36119 of 20255. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the appropriate authority for obtaining the legal heir certificate and thereafter, he can approach the respondents for disposing his representation. No costs.23.09.2025Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation Case : Yes/NospPage No.4 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.36119 of 2025To1.The Chief Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, Central Office, Having office at No.763, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.2.The Chief Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, Branch Office, Saligramam Branch, Saligramam, Chennai – 600 093. Page No.5 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.36119 of 2025M.DHANDAPANI, J.spW.P.No.36119 of 202523.09.2025Page No.6 of 6
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.